How Much Privacy Should You Expect In A Marriage?

looking at this thread I think I might take you up on that offer :P

Reminds me that time where the admin of GameFAQS, CJayC, said "Mark my words" in a statement and one of the moderators modded him for "Mod Baiting".

Historic moment right there.

Why do they call it PMS ...










because mad cow disease was already taken :o

The misogyny in this thread scares the ***out of me. lol XD Apparently I have to see people in different light now. :(

I have learned one thing from it though, apparently being a woman means I am pure evil and spite. :P

The misogyny in this thread scares the ***out of me. lol XD Apparently I have to see people in different light now. :( I have learned one thing from it though, apparently being a woman means I am pure evil and spite. :P

That's what you get for succumbing to temptation and eating the apple then giving it to man. :P

The misogyny in this thread scares the ***out of me. lol XD Apparently I have to see people in different light now. :( I have learned one thing from it though, apparently being a woman means I am pure evil and spite. :P

... comes from a long time of schooltime ith typical female raising (all evil things happened are male-made; it's perverted when you watch a elementary history and the teacher (mostly female do this) and she knocks down every little thing to be male that is evil.) getting raised without a father and so on and so on. what can we blame the guys for when we didn't have a role model cuz the *** kept getting new men? seriously though, imagine a man that had a first wife. he got a kid with her and left her with the kid. got a second wife that was drunk most of the times and beat the kids and even beat him. he left her and got a third one. everything was fine... till he got bored and started an affair with his ex second wife. she gets now sued due to breaking into his email account. i don't know i find both versions the real and this one extremely stupid and whoever is taking the side of the women is 1. a person that hides something himsel/herself (defending position: oh my goerd, no way he did that) 2. stressed up off the other gender. 3. extremely egoistic. last point is pretty much fitting for today's women. (don't know you so this is an assumption) about that part with elementary school history lessons: i wrote my finals about something comparable to that school situation, so if wanna go deeper in that matter i need to make some coffee.

http://www.freep.com/article/20101226/NEWS03/12260530/Is-reading-wife-s-e-mail-a-crime?-Rochester-Hills-man-faces-trial
A Rochester Hills man faces up to 5 years in prison -- for reading his wife's e-mail.

Oakland County prosecutors, relying on a Michigan statute typically used to prosecute crimes such as identity theft or stealing trade secrets, have charged Leon Walker, 33, with a felony after he logged onto a laptop in the home he shared with his wife, Clara Walker.

Using her password, he accessed her Gmail account and learned she was having an affair. He now is facing a Feb. 7 trial. She filed for divorce, which was finalized earlier this month.

Legal experts say it's the first time the statute has been used in a domestic case, and it might be hard to prove

"It's going to be interesting because there are no clear legal answers here," said Frederick Lane, a Vermont attorney and nationally recognized expert who has published five books on electronic privacy. The fact that the two still were living together, and that Leon Walker had routine access to the computer, may help him, Lane said.

"I would guess there is enough gray area to suggest that she could not have an absolute expectation of privacy," he said.

About 45% of divorce cases involve some snooping -- and gathering -- of e-mail, Facebook and other online material, Lane said. But he added that those are generally used by the warring parties for civil reasons -- not for criminal prosecution.

"It is an indication of how deeply electronic communication is woven into our lives," Lane said.

Leon Walker was Clara Walker's third husband. Her e-mail showed she was having an affair with her second husband, a man who once had been arrested for beating her in front of her small son. Leon Walker, worried that the child might be exposed to domestic violence again, handed the e-mails over to the child's father, Clara Walker's first husband. He promptly filed an emergency motion to obtain custody.

Leon Walker, a computer technician with Oakland County, was arrested in February 2009, after Clara Walker learned he had provided the e-mails to her first husband.

"I was doing what I had to do," Leon Walker told the Free Press in a recent interview. He has been out on bond since shortly after his arrest. "We're talking about putting a child in danger."

Oakland County Prosecutor Jessica Cooper defended her decision to charge Leon Walker.

"The guy is a hacker," Cooper said in a voice mail response to the Free Press last week. "It was password protected, he had wonderful skills, and was highly trained. Then he downloaded them and used them in a very contentious way."

Walker's defense attorney, Leon Weiss, said Cooper is "dead wrong" on the law.

"I've been a defense attorney for 34 years and I've never seen anything like this," he said. "This is a hacking statute, the kind of statute they use if you try to break into a government system or private business for some nefarious purpose. It's to protect against identity fraud, to keep somebody from taking somebody's intellectual property or trade secrets.

"I have to ask: 'Don't the prosecutors have more important things to do with their time?' "

Clara Walker, through her attorney, Michael McCulloch, declined an interview with the Free Press.

In the preliminary exam, Clara Walker testified that although Leon Walker had purchased the laptop for her, it was hers alone and she kept the password a secret.

Leon Walker told the Free Press he routinely used the computer and that she kept all of her passwords in a small book next to the computer.

"It was a family computer," he said. "I did work on it all the time."

A jury ultimately will decide.

Several area defense attorneys were astonished by the filing of the criminal charges.

"What's the difference between that and parents who get on their kids' Facebook accounts?" attorney Deborah McKelvy said. "You're going to have to start prosecuting a whole bunch of parents."

/clap /truth
I blame TV. and the sad part, its really probably TV's fault. >.>

who makes TV?

... the Jews?

nahhhh they just make what plays on the TVs.

... the Jews?

nahhhh they just make what plays on the TVs.
i just don't know how someone can blame TV.
it's always something.
if not television it's something else IMO.
gotta blame ***on something don't we :P

lol. Didnt mean to throw this off topic. And I was commenting on the egotistical part of Corres's post as a joke. And "Jews" made me lol.

It's on page six, as long as it's psuedo-intellectual it should be fine.

and corres don't get me started on your post...i'll be ready momentarily.
Ok. I'm ready.
as for how females behave in society, Corres do you get rejected much?