Ignorance Taken To The Next Level.

yes, yes it is.

Again, there is always that .000000000000000000000000000000000001% that it CAN happen, according to mathematical theory. This is how you can religious and scientific at the same time.

The Civil War was fought to preserve slavery/constitutional right of only white men to vote.

The right for women to vote required a lot of sacrifice including torture inside of prison.

There are a lot more examples.

the bible needs kept as a study work as something really stupid that people followed for no good reason, why do you think for the longest time the church organizations didn't allow people to own bibles, that the only ones who could interpret "gods words" were ordained priests, because if you read it yourself you'll realize the thing is *** up to no end.

Also by his logic there is a Spaghetti Monster, big foot, etc. because there is no conclusive proof they do not exist.

See. Jet doesn't actually believe in science or logic. Jet only believes that he is always right. In fact I think Jet is religious because he clearly believes himself to be god/omnipotent. The kid is void of logical reasoning.

how about no, there aren't exceptions to rules in mathematics, that's what makes them rules, this isn't english class.

unless somebody can provide evidence for their faith (making it no longer blind faith) then it is impossible for a person to be both.

typical religious logic there, this thread makes me fear for the future.

Best off yourself now, it only gets worse and you won't go to hell for it!

Big Foot died at the end of "Strange Wilderness"; everyone knows that.

1.) Nothing is perfect

2.) Science never proves anything. It only supports or refutes. This simple mistake in nomenclature signals right away that one lacks a proper scientific education.

3.) Scientific method is not a perfect system. If it was then it would be full proof that scientists don't make mistakes. Most published papers have at least something that can be legitamantly questioned.

4.) Having faith in what you study is a recipe for disaster. This usually comes in the form of assumptions. These are extremely dangerous.

I'm sorry Jet, but you either have no science background, a terrible one, or are in the infancy of your scientific education. Not only that but you are either unable to construct and organize your thoughts, back them up with nothing more than insults or 3 word phrases, or you are getting your rocks off seeing several people formulate logical conversation/debate to your arse-hattery.

This is one of the rules of mathematics...did you not take anything higher than geometry? This is a higher level mathematical theory. There is ALWAY a chance that something can happen and ALWAYS a chance that something can't. There is never 100% possibility for ANYTHING. If you disagree, Richard Dawkins would like to have a word with you, sir.

not if you understand the concepts behind it, there is no reason to believe in a deity, it's ignorant to claim your faith is a reason.

How is there bad logic?

You believe god can't exist because there is no proof that he does not.

Conclusion: You believe that proof is required before you can believe.

You believe that god does can't exist yet there is no proof that he does not.

Conclusion: You do not have proof therefore you can not believe he does not exist.

If you don't agree that he does not exist then you must therefore believe that he either exists or could exist.

What's your proof that he could exist? None.

What's the proof that he doesnt exist? None.

What should your opinion be? That it is possible, based upon our currently knowledge, that god may exist. However, it is impossible to prove or disprove and therefore impossible to have a stance AT ALL on the matter because even theories require proof.

You are thus illogical. You have based your entire argument on that fact that religion is illogical and therefore stupid.

Conclusion: If something is illogical it is stupid

Therefore:

Jet you are illogical

Jet you must be stupid.


This thread is over because you have just logically been destroyed. Good luck in future posts.

*** richard dawkins, and no.

I have never stated god can't exist, you're a dumbass, go away.

"What should your opinion be? That it is possible, based upon our currently knowledge, that god may exist. However, it is impossible to prove or disprove and therefore impossible to have a stance AT ALL on the matter because even theories require proof. " this part you actually got right, but you fail to put it with logic

LOL brb finding quotes.

Perhaps some women come close to this ~.o

But the human body is not perfect. Look up how our eye is constructed compared to some of animals. Its akin to having the wires draped over the front of your tv screen.

Also the human body is not symmetrical if you want to look at it from an artistic stand point.

you won't find them, the only part you got right out of that entire *** you just spewed was it's illogical to claim a god does or doesn't exist, and religion is one of these stances, therefore all religion is illogical and or stupid.

Do you need me to logically explain it? You aren't that stupid.

So you aren't an athiest now? You were a few weeks ago.

Ah, now I see you truly are a troll. Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, two of the more recent popular atheists, both agree with the Infinite Possibilities theory...You are no atheist, sir, you are a rebellious, pompous ***.

We need some filters on this site that don't allow submission of posts with the word "logic", "ignorant", or "Bahamut.Jetackuu said:"

Problem solved.

There it is. Truth, finally!

I'm not sure you understand evolutionary genetics completely. Animals (which we are) are usually just adapted/evolve to survive and nothing more- overkill is a waste of energy and resources. It may be survival of the fitest, but nature has time and time again proven that there is always a better design. Perfect would also imply no mistakes. We have plenty of genetic diseases. Perfect would also mean we wouldn't be evolving. And the length of human history is way to short to do any analysis of evolving but there are lots of ideas on where we are heading.