That Impeachment Thing....
Eorzea Time
Item Search
 
Recherche avanc
Player Search
 
Recherche avanc
Free Co. Search
 
Langues: JP EN FR DE
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » That impeachment thing....
That impeachment thing....
First Page 2 3 ... 44 45 46 ... 60 61 62
 Shiva.Zerowone
Offline
Serveur: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Zerowone
Posts: 655
By Shiva.Zerowone 2020-01-29 08:45:10
Link | Citer | R
  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
McConnell declares he doesn’t have the votes to block witnesses.

I'm not too surprised if that's the case. It's not just a RINO vs. Pro-Trump argument anymore. I've been hearing arguments for both angles among even the most ardent Trump-supporting talking heads on the Right. It's all a matter of strategy.


It could just be an attempt to give the illusion that it will not end before the State of the Union this coming Tuesday. Also Republicans control the vote in the Senate so it could end up being a bunch of Biden’s voted to take the stand.
 Asura.Saevel
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9910
By Asura.Saevel 2020-01-29 08:48:13
Link | Citer | R
  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Shiva.Zerowone said: »
McConnell declares he doesn’t have the votes to block witnesses.

I'm not too surprised if that's the case. It's not just a RINO vs. Pro-Trump argument anymore. I've been hearing arguments for both angles among even the most ardent Trump-supporting talking heads on the Right. It's all a matter of strategy.

Yeah if sufficient Senators wish to question witness's then that's totally fine. I don't know any moderates who are against witness testimony, they are just against Democrat control over witness testimony, ala Schiff and the one sided Kangaroo court that the Democrats held.
[+]
 Viciouss
Offline
Posts: 17803
By Viciouss 2020-01-29 08:55:05
Link | Citer | R
  
The next two days are going to be interesting with live questioning for 8 hours.
 Asura.Eiryl
Online
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2020-01-29 08:57:30
Link | Citer | R
  
I think interesting is the most incorrect word you could possibly use for this "thing"

Now if there were actual penalties for lying, then you might have something.
[+]
 Viciouss
Offline
Posts: 17803
By Viciouss 2020-01-29 09:09:03
Link | Citer | R
  
Nah I think it will be the most interesting part of the trial, John Roberts is going to read a lot of questions. And wow Trump is really throwing a tantrum over Bolton, the guy that only he wanted as his NSA. Fun times.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2020-01-29 09:21:17
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
  
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 Viciouss
Offline
Posts: 17803
By Viciouss 2020-01-29 09:26:06
Link | Citer | R
  
Of course witness testimony is completely admissible, not sure what your confused about.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2020-01-29 09:26:38
Link | Citer | R
  
Under oath it can count as evidence. It just logically cannot count as “proof”.
[+]
 Asura.Eiryl
Online
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2020-01-29 09:27:43
Link | Citer | R
  
Long and Short that's how the legal system works. You take people at their word.

Not that it matters. There is literally not a single thing that could ever possibly happen in every possible outcome to get enough reps to grow a spine.
[+]
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Serveur: Garuda
Game: FFXI
user: Chanti
Posts: 11402
By Garuda.Chanti 2020-01-29 09:46:24
Link | Citer | R
  
Bolton ...

He is an honest and principled conservative.

I disagree with his principles, but he sticks by them unwaveringly in an age when most "conservatives" are weathervanes.

I will not like him an iota better if he testifies and brings Trump down, but I will say thanks.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Ozment
Offline
Serveur: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: ozment
Posts: 1116
By Ragnarok.Ozment 2020-01-29 10:04:24
Link | Citer | R
  
A part that confuses me a bit, given the following 2 scenarios:

1) Person A overhears a conversation that person B is having with person C. Person A testifies.

2) Person A has a conversation with person B, fully interacting in that conversation. Person A testifies.

Are those both considered hearsay? Scenario 1 clearly is, but scenario 2 seems it would hold a little more significance in the testimony.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2020-01-29 10:20:08
Link | Citer | R
  
Ragnarok.Ozment said: »
A part that confuses me a bit, given the following 2 scenarios:

1) Person A overhears a conversation that person B is having with person C. Person A testifies.

2) Person A has a conversation with person B, fully interacting in that conversation. Person A testifies.

Are those both considered hearsay? Scenario 1 clearly is, but scenario 2 seems it would hold a little more significance in the testimony.

I’m no lawyer, but my understanding is that it’s hearsay either way if there is no hard evidence to back up your claim. That’s one major reason why “credibility of the witness” is a thing. It’s all subjective, though, and it can be really tough to hit the bar required to convict someone if hearsay is the foundation of your prosecution.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2020-01-29 10:36:20
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
  
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2020-01-29 10:37:47
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
  
Post deleted by User.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2020-01-29 10:46:13
Link | Citer | R
  
DirectX said: »
I didn't know evidence and proof were two different things. They mean the same thing in England.

Do you have a source to back that up? From what I see, “hearsay evidence” is an actual term in English law.
[+]
 Eboneezer
Offline
Posts: 559
By Eboneezer 2020-01-29 10:48:10
Link | Citer | R
  
Wouldn't #2 be like a verbal contract? #1 a verbal contract with a witness? Both normally get thrown out and end with the judge telling person A to get it in writing next time. So many things involved. How was it worded? How could it be interpreted? Those things are impossible to judge when there's no evidence of the agreement other than two people recalling what "they" interpreted/remembered. Unless both parties agree on the terms in court of course.

Just seems like this would be a pretty comparable situation.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2020-01-29 11:20:09
Link | Citer | R
  
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Bolton ...

He is an honest and principled conservative.

I disagree with his principles, but he sticks by them unwaveringly in an age when most "conservatives" are weathervanes.

I will not like him an iota better if he testifies and brings Trump down, but I will say thanks.

Well, that’s part of what is so funny about the way that establishment Republicans operate. They cower and cave when the media pressure hits them, thinking that maybe if they throw the media a bone they’ll get better treatment down the road. The aftermath often results in the kind of response that you gave. “Thanks, but you’re still a Republican and therefore we still hate you.”

Just look at Romney and McCain. They got eviscerated by the Left over the dumbest little minutia and then decided it would be a good idea to reward their haters and undermine their own party for fleeting media praise. It’s like the political form of Stockholm Syndrome. If Romney ran for President again the love affair would be over in a heartbeat.
[+]
 fonewear
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2020-01-29 11:24:07
Link | Citer | R
  
Bolton looks like an ***. And a walrus he can't be trusted.
 fonewear
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2020-01-29 11:28:58
Link | Citer | R
  
John McCain is one of the biggest *** there was. I commend him for his military service. But he seemed like an unpleasant person. Wouldn't let personal grievances with Trump go. Holds on to grudges etc. Just the very definition of an ***.
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2020-01-29 12:16:43
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
  
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2020-01-29 12:23:24
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
  
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 Viciouss
Offline
Posts: 17803
By Viciouss 2020-01-29 12:50:59
Link | Citer | R
  
The answers need to be shorter, the best answers so far have been to Feinstein's question and uh whichever Senator asked if they tried to get Bolton's testimony because they were short and direct to the point.
 Viciouss
Offline
Posts: 17803
By Viciouss 2020-01-29 12:59:16
Link | Citer | R
  
Sylvia Garcia should not answer anymore questions.
 Viciouss
Offline
Posts: 17803
By Viciouss 2020-01-29 13:16:07
Link | Citer | R
  
Dershowitz just went off on some random tangent I don't even remember what question was asked >.>
 Asura.Eiryl
Online
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2020-01-29 13:17:45
Link | Citer | R
  
tl:dr current question

QPQ happens literally all the time, is it illegal?

Dipshit trump just had to make it about himself, because thats who he is.
 Asura.Eiryl
Online
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2020-01-29 13:21:17
Link | Citer | R
  
"we condition aid all the time"

If dipshit simply hadn't opened his mouth and said biden, it would've been completely normal.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2020-01-29 13:26:50
Link | Citer | R
  
So if a condition of the aid was to investigate and root out corruption, and Biden was involved in a shady arrangement with a company that was known to be corrupt, then why shouldn’t an investigation into Biden’s connection with said company be a condition of receiving the aid? It all follows logically.
[+]
 Asura.Eiryl
Online
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2020-01-29 13:28:29
Link | Citer | R
  
Literally every "well to do" human on earth is on or has kids in positions where they get money for doing nothing. Hunter biden is no different. It's literally meaningless in context.

There are right now absolutely hundreds of thousands of people like him getting paid exorbitant amounts of money all over the world.
[+]
 Asura.Saevel
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9910
By Asura.Saevel 2020-01-29 13:28:34
Link | Citer | R
  
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
So if a condition of the aid was to investigate and root out corruption, and Biden was involved in a shady arrangement with a company that was known to be corrupt, then why shouldn’t an investigation into Biden’s connection with said company be a condition of receiving the aid? It all follows logically.

Biden is a Democrat and Democrats are above reproach. Investigating him could hamper their plans to take full control of the US Government and thus should be a crime against humanity.

Like aways, repeat after me

Democrats Good
Republicans Bad
Orange Man VERY VERY BAD!!!
 Bahamut.Ravael
Offline
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Ravael
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2020-01-29 13:30:34
Link | Citer | R
  
Viciouss said: »
Sylvia Garcia should not answer anymore questions.

Did Vic just take issue with a Democrat? Holy crap.
[+]
Top Show Op
First Page 2 3 ... 44 45 46 ... 60 61 62