So anyone that gets elected with enough people to win votes in the top chamber is invincible anyway. Tell me more about how your political system is free from potential corruption due to all of the checks in place.
I'm sorry, we have a long way to go to catch up with your house of Lords in that corruption department.
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
So, you made up words, your still don’t have a clue what you’re talking about, and you linked an entire paragraph to a site that hasn’t even factored in the latest Gallup poll? I don’t need luck, you can’t rebut worth a crap.
Statisticianal...look for it in the new Miriam Webster ;)
Look at the link again...it definitely includes the latest Gallup poll, and like I said it is actually 50% approval/49% disapproval after adjustment. I'd post the criteria for that adjustment, but last time you became angry and said I didn't need to.
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
Let’s break down this post. You repeated stuff that I have said recently as if somehow I didn’t know it, then linked an entire paragraph (for some reason) to a site I’m already familiar with and hoped that somehow it would do all the work of rebutting my point in your behalf.
If you’re so suited to this argument, then tell me what “after adjustment” means, because judging by your post you’re repeating something in the wrong context and don’t actually know how any of this works.
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
Let’s break down this post. You repeated stuff that I have said recently as if somehow I didn’t know it, then linked an entire paragraph (for some reason) to a site I’m already familiar with and hoped that somehow it would do all the work of rebutting my point in your behalf.
If you’re so suited to this argument, then tell me what “after adjustment” means, because judging by your post you’re repeating something in the wrong context and don’t actually know how any of this works.
I didn't offer a rebuttal, I actually agreed with your Gallup poll numbers. I simply offered a larger sample pool of polls, instead of focusing on just one single poll. Out of this arose the need for the creation if a new word: Statisticianal. You're welcome.
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
Let’s break down this post. You repeated stuff that I have said recently as if somehow I didn’t know it, then linked an entire paragraph (for some reason) to a site I’m already familiar with and hoped that somehow it would do all the work of rebutting my point in your behalf.
If you’re so suited to this argument, then tell me what “after adjustment” means, because judging by your post you’re repeating something in the wrong context and don’t actually know how any of this works.
I didn't offer a rebuttal, I actually agreed with your Gallup poll numbers. I simply offered a larger sample pool of polls, instead of focusing on just one single poll. Out of this arose the need for the creation if a new word: Statisticianal. You're welcome.
So, you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about, and offered a website that I’m intimately familiar with as a way of trying to one-up me. Weird flex, but okay.
Holy crap, that latest Gallup poll. 49% approval, 50% disapproval for a pollster that is almost always on the low end. How’s that impeachment working for you guys?
Let’s break down this post. You repeated stuff that I have said recently as if somehow I didn’t know it, then linked an entire paragraph (for some reason) to a site I’m already familiar with and hoped that somehow it would do all the work of rebutting my point in your behalf.
If you’re so suited to this argument, then tell me what “after adjustment” means, because judging by your post you’re repeating something in the wrong context and don’t actually know how any of this works.
I didn't offer a rebuttal, I actually agreed with your Gallup poll numbers. I simply offered a larger sample pool of polls, instead of focusing on just one single poll. Out of this arose the need for the creation if a new word: Statisticianal. You're welcome.
So, you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about, and offered a website that I’m intimately familiar with as a way of trying to one-up me. Weird flex, but okay.
I simply posted a link to a site that supports your Gallup poll claim, and also offers additional information. I don't really care to hear how intimate you are with that site, I mean, we all have our fetishes...but ew.
