Every time I go to America, they either stop us in Toronto, or Chicago. I know Chicago has these screenings, dunno about Toronto.
I always hated the Chicago airport. Now it's just fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.
Guy In Speedo Gets Through TSA Checkpoint
|
Guy in Speedo gets through TSA checkpoint
Ramuh.Kailana said: I read about TSA people putting their hands between peoples underwear and skin and essentially feeling their way around down there. No matter how much I mentally prepare myself for that, I'm going to cry. I'll probably get even more advanced screening as a result, being all suspicious and whatnot (>______>) and really, the entire idea just scares the hell out of me. the more advanced screening is where they just go ahead, drop all pretense and rape you don't worry guys it's for your own good you don't want the terrorists to win right
[+]
Caitsith.Shiroi said: Ragnarok.Zanno said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: It is in fact the opposite, if someone you knew died in 9/11 would you still say "*** security I rather die than being screened"? And if you were sexually abused as a kid, would you want a TSA agents hands all over your 12 yo daughter? Or even worse, if your child has been sexually abused before, would you want them to have a complete stranger touching them like that? Do you need it?  hint: It's the Berlin wall Every single TSA agents will abuse your childs, at work with witnesses. On that note, I'll say it could very well happen. Quote: IT'S OKAY IF WE DON'T HAVE RIGHTS CUZ NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN What right do you lose by being screened? Seriously? 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it.
[+]
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Ragnarok.Zanno said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: It is in fact the opposite, if someone you knew died in 9/11 would you still say "*** security I rather die than being screened"? And if you were sexually abused as a kid, would you want a TSA agents hands all over your 12 yo daughter? Or even worse, if your child has been sexually abused before, would you want them to have a complete stranger touching them like that? Do you need it? hint: It's the Berlin wall Every single TSA agents will abuse your childs, at work with witnesses. On that note, I'll say it could very well happen. Quote: IT'S OKAY IF WE DON'T HAVE RIGHTS CUZ NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN What right do you lose by being screened? Seriously? 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. no way dude not unreasonable search handing over your tampon is perfectly reasonable >.> Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Ramuh.Kailana said: I read about TSA people putting their hands between peoples underwear and skin and essentially feeling their way around down there. No matter how much I mentally prepare myself for that, I'm going to cry. I'll probably get even more advanced screening as a result, being all suspicious and whatnot (>______>) and really, the entire idea just scares the hell out of me. the more advanced screening is where they just go ahead, drop all pretense and rape you don't worry guys it's for your own good you don't want the terrorists to win right ter·ror·ist /ˈtɛrərɪst/ Show Spelled[ter-er-ist] Show IPA –noun 1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism. 2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others. 3. (formerly) a member of a political group in russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror. 4. an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France. yeah, use some more sarcasm with this one. Is it just me that thinks that Shiroi is a TSA agent on some airport, and that he loves his job?
[+]
Ragnarok.Zanno said: Is it just me that thinks that Shiroi is a TSA agent on some airport, and that he loves his job? hahahhahaha Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Ragnarok.Zanno said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: It is in fact the opposite, if someone you knew died in 9/11 would you still say "*** security I rather die than being screened"? And if you were sexually abused as a kid, would you want a TSA agents hands all over your 12 yo daughter? Or even worse, if your child has been sexually abused before, would you want them to have a complete stranger touching them like that? Do you need it? hint: It's the Berlin wall Every single TSA agents will abuse your childs, at work with witnesses. On that note, I'll say it could very well happen. Quote: IT'S OKAY IF WE DON'T HAVE RIGHTS CUZ NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN NINE ELEVEN What right do you lose by being screened? Seriously? 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. no way dude not unreasonable search handing over your tampon is perfectly reasonable >.> getting your kids felt up is perfectly reasonable. >.> Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. I'm told if you do, it's an 11k fine. I can't afford that. Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. again, we have already went over the "logic" behind not using the plane, it's a fallacy, move along. Ramuh.Kailana said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. I'm told if you do, it's an 11k fine. I can't afford that. that makes absolutely no sense, but wouldn't surprise me if they had that policy. Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. being forced to live as a second class citizen in exchange for keeping your rights is not keeping your rights i.e. you have to vote republican or you can't have a license. it's ok, because you don't HAVE to drive a car... ...right? Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. again, we have already went over the "logic" behind not using the plane, it's a fallacy, move along. indeed we did Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. again, we have already went over the "logic" behind not using the plane, it's a fallacy, move along. indeed we did I see what you did there... him and that girl in the bikini got it right. *** TSA and their forced sexual advances.
Ifrit.Kungfuhustle said: him and that girl in the bikini got it right. *** TSA and their forced sexual advances. going to "weird al" the nwa song? Ramuh.Kailana said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. I'm told if you do, it's an 11k fine. I can't afford that. Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Ramuh.Kailana said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. I'm told if you do, it's an 11k fine. I can't afford that. that makes absolutely no sense, but wouldn't surprise me if they had that policy. TSA promises $10,000 fine for refusing airport body search Caitsith.Shiroi said: Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. being forced to live as a second class citizen in exchange for keeping your rights is not keeping your rights i.e. you have to vote republican or you can't have a license. it's ok, because you don't HAVE to drive a car... ...right? This goes against democracy and actually removes a right. Bad example. removing the right to fly if you don't forfeit a constitutional right is different? afraid not. some people's livelihood depends on their ability to fly. my dad's for example.
[+]
People need to chill.
They wanted more security, they *** got it. Now they don't want to be screened because it invades their privacy. HOW the HELL do you expect them to catch the bad guys? The security people don't know who the *** you are, maybe you are a terrorist for all they know. Also, on the video: No shirt, no shoes, no service. I believe it's written somewhere that in most buildings, you need a shirt and shoes or you can get kicked out. Or something like that. Cerberus.Kalyna said: People need to chill. They wanted more security, they *** got it. Now they don't want to be screened because it invades their privacy. HOW the HELL do you expect them to catch the bad guys? The security people don't know who the *** you are, maybe you are a terrorist for all they know. Also, on the video: No shirt, no shoes, no service. I believe it's written somewhere that in most buildings, you need a shirt and shoes or you can get kicked out. Or something like that.
[+]
Oh geeze here we go with the whole everything is a privilege, not a right ***.
Leviathan.Chaosx said: Ramuh.Kailana said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. I'm told if you do, it's an 11k fine. I can't afford that. Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Ramuh.Kailana said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. I'm told if you do, it's an 11k fine. I can't afford that. that makes absolutely no sense, but wouldn't surprise me if they had that policy. TSA promises $10,000 fine for refusing airport body search If I were that guy, I'd be countersuing the hell out of them. dear jesus.
a business owner who puts up a no shirt no shoes no service sign is making a private decision for a private business i can start a store next door with a sign that says no shirt no shoes no problem the equivalent of what we're doing would be the government sending in a guard to forcefully ensure that everyone had shirt and shoes even at beachfront restaurants where the owner really, really, doesn't want that sign to be there other points have already been addressed, read the thread etc.
[+]
Caitsith.Shiroi said: Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. being forced to live as a second class citizen in exchange for keeping your rights is not keeping your rights i.e. you have to vote republican or you can't have a license. it's ok, because you don't HAVE to drive a car... ...right? This goes against democracy and actually removes a right. Bad example. removing the right to fly if you don't forfeit a constitutional right is different? afraid not. some people's livelihood depends on their ability to fly. my dad's for example. You don't have a right for being able to fly. I could say : Taxes are removing my right to be rich. It's my right to have the freedom to murder someone. Doesn't work like that. explain the difference between right to fly and right to drive your right to swing your fist ends where other mans nose begins etc Cerberus.Kalyna said: People need to chill. They wanted more security, they *** got it. Now they don't want to be screened because it invades their privacy. HOW the HELL do you expect them to catch the bad guys? The security people don't know who the *** you are, maybe you are a terrorist for all they know. Also, on the video: No shirt, no shoes, no service. I believe it's written somewhere that in most buildings, you need a shirt and shoes or you can get kicked out. Or something like that. that's the airports policy that they can choose to enforce, to be honest at this point, it would be bad business for the airports to not allow the customers, they are losing enough as it is.
[+]
Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Caitsith.Shiroi said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: 4th amendment, bill of rights. Check it. You have the right to refuse the search. being forced to live as a second class citizen in exchange for keeping your rights is not keeping your rights i.e. you have to vote republican or you can't have a license. it's ok, because you don't HAVE to drive a car... ...right? This goes against democracy and actually removes a right. Bad example. removing the right to fly if you don't forfeit a constitutional right is different? afraid not. some people's livelihood depends on their ability to fly. my dad's for example. You don't have a right for being able to fly. I could say : Taxes are removing my right to be rich. It's my right to have the freedom to murder someone. Doesn't work like that. explain the difference between right to fly and right to drive your right to swing your fist ends where other mans nose begins etc driving actually has a lot more restrictions, just none of your civil liberties are violated when you obtain a drivers license or every time you enter your car. Carbuncle.Sevourn said: dear jesus. a business owner who puts up a no shirt no shoes no service sign is making a private decision for a private business i can start a store next door with a sign that says no shirt no shoes no problem the equivalent of what we're doing would be the government sending in a guard to forcefully ensure that everyone had shirt and shoes even at beachfront restaurants where the owner really, really, doesn't want that sign to be there other points have already been addressed, read the thread etc. |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.