Post deleted by User.
UN Votes To Allow Gays To Be Executed Without Caus
|
Forum » Everything Else »
Politics and Religion
»
UN votes to allow gays to be executed without caus
UN votes to allow gays to be executed without caus
Lakshmi.Mabrook said: Well I can say I will laugh a bit if the Islamic community does legalize murder for asexual people, because in the Quran it says you're only suppose to harm just those that causes you harm. I'm sure we can all agree that gay people don't give a crap more than normal people and the amount of emotional abuse they have to endure everyday from closed minded people is honorable but for that they become nice people and the killings would send them straight to hell. Asexual? Erm, are you are referring to anyone is Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual or Transgender? If you are referring to the LGBT community then there are already laws in 79 countries that make that illegal. Definition Asexual: 1. Having no evident sex or sex organs; sexless. 2. Relating to, produced by, or involving reproduction that occurs without the union of male and female gametes, as in binary fission or budding. 3. Lacking interest in or desire for sex. Lakshmi.Mabrook said: Well I can say I will laugh a bit if the Islamic community does legalize murder for asexual people, because in the Quran it says you're only suppose to harm just those that causes you harm. I'm sure we can all agree that gay people don't give a crap more than normal people and the amount of emotional abuse they have to endure everyday from closed minded people is honorable but for that they become nice people and the killings would send them straight to hell. The human race is giving new definiton to devolving, and by association the term Neanderthal.
This upsets me so much I can't even gather my thoughts.. And that's why certain religions fail. *cough*Islam*cough*
Shiva.Khimaira said: The human race is giving new definiton to devolving, and by association the term Neanderthal. This upsets me so much I can't even gather my thoughts.. :( This is Dominance Bahamut.Shaj said: Shiva.Khimaira said: The human race is giving new definiton to devolving, and by association the term Neanderthal. This upsets me so much I can't even gather my thoughts.. I can has hug? :( Im gonna die in the closet nao ; ; Shiva.Khimaira said: Bahamut.Shaj said: Shiva.Khimaira said: The human race is giving new definiton to devolving, and by association the term Neanderthal. This upsets me so much I can't even gather my thoughts.. I can has hug? :( Im gonna die in the closet nao ; ; Ramuh.Vinvv said: Shiva.Khimaira said: Bahamut.Shaj said: Shiva.Khimaira said: The human race is giving new definiton to devolving, and by association the term Neanderthal. This upsets me so much I can't even gather my thoughts.. ^^ The GED thread made me happy at least Even though I dont agree with that lifestyle, The people involved still should be protected in the declaration, though after reading the article its very obvious why it was voted down, due to religious fundamentalism in africa and the arab world
Phoenix.Degs said: Even though I dont agree with that lifestyle, The people involved still should be protected in the declaration, though after reading the article its very obvious why it was voted down, due to religious fundamentalism in africa and the arab world Ragnarok.Blindphleb said: Carbuncle.Sevourn said: i'll be the first to agree with you that the motives aren't pure however--and correct me if i'm wrong, i might be, though i don't think i am it's a largely ceremonial/symbolic declaration i just can't see the change in wording changing anything arab and african countries would continue to persecute gays if you very slightly changed the wording in an unenforced resolution and they're not going to step up their persecution over a wording change either things will continue exactly as they would have if the UN got distracted and completely forgot to do this years generic condemnation of killing people it's a reflection of an attitude we(most of us anyway) were already aware of yup lolafrica/lol extreme islam and their 5th century attitudes but that's nothing new i don't believe it changes anything from a practical standpoint either way to answer your second question, you don't at least not as the world stands today When we're talking about Africa and Islam it's also important to notice that several Caribbean countries voted along with them. Along the lines of your last point. I think it comes down to: are you an advocate of cultural relativism or are you a universalist. Do you believe that cultural values supersede human rights? Do you believe that human rights should be universal? I believe the UN should be governed by a universalist mindset. The UN was formed in the embers of The Holocaust with the goal to fight for human rights. From putting China in a veto power position to their failure to prevent genocide. In my opinion they have missed that mark by miles. i don't think it comes down to me being a relativist vs a universalist i'm more concerned with what might actually happen than i am grappling over which philosophy i should pursue in a venue i have no power to change for the un to truly work, individual nations will have to give up a lot more power than they are willing to give up today resolutions would have to be binding and enforceable as things stand today, the nations that matter are not willing to give up enough power to allow the un to act as the global police in a century or two... we'll see even then, i'm not sure i support it the concept of the sovereign nation has a lot to recommend it and the idea of a powerful world government with the wrong leader is a very scary thought Didn't read whole thread, cause I don't really care.
But maybe gays should just be gay in countries where you don't get killed for it regardless. I know I'm doing great~ On a more serious point: We are not de-evolving as a society. Look back 100 years and tell me things aren't better. Christ *** people are impatient. Fenrir.Snick said: Didn't read whole thread, cause I don't really care. But maybe gays should just be gay in countries where you don't get killed for it regardless. I know I'm doing great~ I guess ill be fine if I stay in Canada :L I wanted to live in New York someday though x.x I also really don't get why people get so worked up over ***like this. This changed nothing, gays being killed for being gay was and is going to happen regardless of what a bunch of suits say. I'd like it to not be this way too, but I guess I'm just too realistic for this forum~
Edit: But I'm sure somebody will come in and tell me how stupid I am and how I'm such a bad homosexual or whatever. Fenrir.Snick said: I also really don't get why people get so worked up over ***like this. This changed nothing, gays being killed for being gay was and is going to happen regardless of what a bunch of suits say. I'd like it to not be this way too, but I guess I'm just too realistic for this forum~ Edit: But I'm sure somebody will come in and tell me how stupid I am and how I'm such a bad homosexual or whatever. The problem is that this makes it seem acceptable to excersize homophobia Shiva.Khimaira said: Fenrir.Snick said: I also really don't get why people get so worked up over ***like this. This changed nothing, gays being killed for being gay was and is going to happen regardless of what a bunch of suits say. I'd like it to not be this way too, but I guess I'm just too realistic for this forum~ Edit: But I'm sure somebody will come in and tell me how stupid I am and how I'm such a bad homosexual or whatever. The problem is that this makes it seem acceptable to excersize homophobia
[+]
Carbuncle.Sevourn said: i don't think it comes down to me being a relativist vs a universalist i'm more concerned with what might actually happen than i am grappling over which philosophy i should pursue in a venue i have no power to change Carbuncle.Sevourn said: for the un to truly work, individual nations will have to give up a lot more power than they are willing to give up today resolutions would have to be binding and enforceable as things stand today, the nations that matter are not willing to give up enough power to allow the un to act as the global police Carbuncle.Sevourn said: in a century or two... we'll see even then, i'm not sure i support it the concept of the sovereign nation has a lot to recommend it and the idea of a powerful world government with the wrong leader is a very scary thought Ending state sovereignty is probably about a realistic as doing away with religion, and in some areas they are the same thing. Fenrir.Snick said: I also really don't get why people get so worked up over ***like this. This changed nothing, gays being killed for being gay was and is going to happen regardless of what a bunch of suits say. I'd like it to not be this way too, but I guess I'm just too realistic for this forum~ Edit: But I'm sure somebody will come in and tell me how stupid I am and how I'm such a bad homosexual or whatever. People just need to deal with it. Ragnarok.Blindphleb said: Carbuncle.Sevourn said: in a century or two... we'll see even then, i'm not sure i support it the concept of the sovereign nation has a lot to recommend it and the idea of a powerful world government with the wrong leader is a very scary thought Ending state sovereignty is probably about a realistic as doing away with religion, and in some areas they are the same thing. i think it's more of an eggs in one basket thing if a hitler(yay godwins law!) attains power over germany there's still a chance for other nations to stop him and remove him from power if a hitler gets control of a world government stronger than any individual government i think the task of removing him from power would be much, much harder especially if we've given up civil liberties surveillance-wise by that time essentially a malicious leader who has power over me is just a little bit less scary because at least i've got a glimmer of hope that someone strong enough to stop him will do so Shiva.Khimaira said: The human race is giving new definiton to devolving, and by association the term Neanderthal. This upsets me so much I can't even gather my thoughts.. that's a shame if you gathered your thoughts you might think to read the article and figure out you're upset over a tiny wording change on an unenforced document if you didn't already know africa/middle east didn't like gays...
[+]
Sevourn, since you have a woman as your avatar i assume you are female and therefor i wish to procreate with you.
so exactly what did you want to do with me when my avatar was a potato
Carbuncle.Sevourn said: pound my vag babe the amount of wrong.... Carbuncle.Sevourn said: Shiva.Khimaira said: The human race is giving new definiton to devolving, and by association the term Neanderthal. This upsets me so much I can't even gather my thoughts.. that's a shame if you gathered your thoughts you might think to read the article and figure out you're upset over a tiny wording change on an unenforced document if you didn't already know africa/middle east didn't like gays... and on a serious note. QFT ^ i didn't post then, i only know dora.
but i guess i'd mash you up and eat you. i guess i the same thing applies here. Fenrir.Snick said: but i guess i'd mash you up and eat you. oh my god that's so hot i'm oozing butter i want my old avi back
but ah won't let me change it ;_; |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.