White House Gives In On Bush-Era Tax Cuts

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Langues: JP EN FR DE
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » White House gives in on Bush-Era Tax Cuts
White House gives in on Bush-Era Tax Cuts
First Page 2 3 4 5 ... 18 19 20
 Ramuh.Vinvv
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: vinvv
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2010-11-11 15:34:51
Link | Citer | R
 
Caitsith.Mahayaya said:
The model this country was founded on was for economic and social freedom and that's the model I would like to see us continue to follow. You don't get economic freedom if you leave it up to elected officials to decide what cars you buy. We started off saying that government should be small and just provide safety for citizens. Regulations for things that need regulating as to not play towards corruption. Instead, the government itself has become the corrupted part. Growing without bounds and without reason.

We started this country with a National Debt, and Andrew Jackson was able to bring the Debt of the entire country back to 0. Since then, it's been growing and growing and no president is expected to do anything about it. People just say that that's a lost cause and it's been hard enough for people to even create an accurate and debt-reducing budget. It doesn't help that as the number grows, the interest alone on that debt is getting unwieldly.

I don't want no government, I just want people to do something about this, and increasing taxes is not the way.
How do you know?
Was this government created with a mass world economy in mind?
I agree with Catastrophe about corporations actually.
people used to think lots of crazy things 100's of years ago...but as years go by you learn that ***changes.

 Cerberus.Zandra
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Zandra7
Posts: 736
By Cerberus.Zandra 2010-11-11 15:36:28
Link | Citer | R
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said:

Lol thanks, your link just gave me more accurate data.

So in 2001 before the tax cuts took effect jan-dec the rates of unemployment were (1rst half enacted june 2001):
4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7
Bold is june in case you wondered

Then in 2002 & 2003 with them in effect:
5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0

2003 (2nd half enacted May):
5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7
Bold is May.

Ok I was wrong the steady increase took place earlier than I thought.

Don't feel like copying and pasting the rest, but surely look at your link
There's the 20062004-2007 small decrease I mentioned.
Then the huge rise in 2008.

^^ FIXED


EDIT::

lol let me paste it for you. Don't forget that we had a small recession in 2001 which I guess the tax cuts caused if i think i understand what you're saying (don't forget about 9/11 which significantly contributed to it as well).

Oh and way to leave out 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008

2004 - 5.7,5.6,5.8,5.6,5.6,5.6,5.5,5.4,5.4,5.5,5.4,5.4

2005 - 5.2,5.4,5.2,5.2,5.1,5.1,5.0,4.9,5.0,5.0,5.0,4.8

2006 - 4.7,4.8,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.4

2007 - 4.6,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.8,4.7,4.9

2008 - 4.9,4.8,5.1,5.0,5.5,5.6,5.8,6.2,6.2,6.6,6.8,7.2

but according to you this had nothing to do with the tax cuts.....


 Ramuh.Vinvv
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: vinvv
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2010-11-11 15:38:20
Link | Citer | R
 
Cerberus.Zandra said:
Leviathan.Chaosx said:

Lol thanks, your link just gave me more accurate data.

So in 2001 before the tax cuts took effect jan-dec the rates of unemployment were (1rst half enacted june 2001):
4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7
Bold is june in case you wondered

Then in 2002 & 2003 with them in effect:
5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0

2003 (2nd half enacted May):
5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7
Bold is May.

Ok I was wrong the steady increase took place earlier than I thought.

Don't feel like copying and pasting the rest, but surely look at your link
There's the 20062004-2007 small decrease I mentioned.
Then the huge rise in 2008.


lol let me paste it for you. Don't forget that we had a small recession in 2001 which as well as 9/11 which significantly contributed too.

Oh and way to leave out 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008

2004 - 5.7,5.6,5.8,5.6,5.6,5.6,5.5,5.4,5.4,5.5,5.4,5.4

2005 - 5.2,5.4,5.2,5.2,5.1,5.1,5.0,4.9,5.0,5.0,5.0,4.8

2006 - 4.7,4.8,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.4

2007 - 4.6,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.8,4.7,4.9

2008 - 4.9,4.8,5.1,5.0,5.5,5.6,5.8,6.2,6.2,6.6,6.8,7.2

but according to you this had nothing to do with the tax cuts.....


we'll all I can say is.
we'll see.
you obviously have more at stake than I do.
So if/when you fall you're gonna fall hard.
 Caitsith.Mahayaya
Offline
Serveur: Caitsith
Game: FFXI
user: Trebold
Posts: 3341
By Caitsith.Mahayaya 2010-11-11 15:41:45
Link | Citer | R
 
Nah, the corruption has always been in the hands of banks and the government. Corporations provide a service, why would I be upset with them? They create jobs, buyable products(that I can choose to buy if I want), and they certainly don't cost me a dime(other than the ones that were bailed out for God knows what reason). The government on the other hand costs me a lot. As someone mentioned in the other thread, every citizen has about a $40,000 debt placed on their head at birth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson#Opposition_to_the_National_Bank

Andrew Jackson was one of my favorite presidents for the work he did in trying to make American citizens indebted to no one.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 15:43:38
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Ramuh.Vinvv
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: vinvv
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2010-11-11 15:51:12
Link | Citer | R
 
banks are not technically corporations now?
weird.
they make jobs and provide you with those crazy customizable credit cards!
I was always under the impression that the flow of money worked like a wave from the top to the bottom...hence the trickle-down phrase(which I believe is a broken system).
Corporations such as Enron which provided energy(a service), where they fraudulently stole money from stockholders?
If that's not an example of corporate wrong-doing I don't know what is.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2010-11-11 15:54:34
Link | Citer | R
 
Cerberus.Zandra said:
Leviathan.Chaosx said:

Lol thanks, your link just gave me more accurate data.

So in 2001 before the tax cuts took effect jan-dec the rates of unemployment were (1rst half enacted june 2001):
4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7
Bold is june in case you wondered

Then in 2002 & 2003 with them in effect:
5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0

2003 (2nd half enacted May):
5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7
Bold is May.

Ok I was wrong the steady increase took place earlier than I thought.

Don't feel like copying and pasting the rest, but surely look at your link
There's the 20062004-2007 small decrease I mentioned.
Then the huge rise in 2008.

^^ FIXED


EDIT::

lol let me paste it for you. Don't forget that we had a small recession in 2001 which I guess the tax cuts caused if i think i understand what you're saying (don't forget about 9/11 which significantly contributed to it as well).

Oh and way to leave out 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008

2004 - 5.7,5.6,5.8,5.6,5.6,5.6,5.5,5.4,5.4,5.5,5.4,5.4

2005 - 5.2,5.4,5.2,5.2,5.1,5.1,5.0,4.9,5.0,5.0,5.0,4.8

2006 - 4.7,4.8,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.4

2007 - 4.6,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.8,4.7,4.9

2008 - 4.9,4.8,5.1,5.0,5.5,5.6,5.8,6.2,6.2,6.6,6.8,7.2

but according to you this had nothing to do with the tax cuts.....


2004?! Lol! End of 2005 a little.

So basically during the best times, the tax cuts brought the numbers down to almost the levels they were before the cuts.

But nothing close to these years:

1998
4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.4

1999
4.3 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0

2000
4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9


Definitely looks like the levels were way better off without the cuts.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:03:12
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:08:11
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Serveur: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2010-11-11 16:31:20
Link | Citer | R
 
Sylph.Dobrusi said:
I'm just going to throw this out there, you guys should read "Trickle up Poverty" by Michael Savage. Before you think he is some right wing nutjob, he was VERY critical about President Bush. I have read it twice and it is an amazing book! Just wanted to share.
Just like I thought. I figured for the lulz I'd check out this book, and exactly what I expected to find:



You're a Glenn Beck fan aren't you?
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:33:05
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Ramuh.Vinvv
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: vinvv
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2010-11-11 16:36:04
Link | Citer | R
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said:
Sylph.Dobrusi said:
I'm just going to throw this out there, you guys should read "Trickle up Poverty" by Michael Savage. Before you think he is some right wing nutjob, he was VERY critical about President Bush. I have read it twice and it is an amazing book! Just wanted to share.
Just like I thought. I figured for the lulz I'd check out this book, and exactly what I expected to find:



You're a Glenn Beck fan aren't you?
his way of endorsing the books that he is critical of bush...but he fails to mention the right-wing nut hatred of obama.
I know obama-bashing is good for republican sales...but it makes it hard for me to not see everything this guy says as something not full of bias.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:37:30
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:38:00
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:40:53
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:41:14
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:41:52
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Ramuh.Vinvv
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: vinvv
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2010-11-11 16:42:21
Link | Citer | R
 
Savage plays to his audience well. Those that only want to hear part of the story may enjoy the smooth rants of Savage. He argues like Reverend Wright (although for the other side and to a larger audience) and tells the Fox News-type audience exactly what they want to hear.

You can lump me together into some group and assume I agree with them on everything...but I try to question everything I read rather than taking words at face value :/
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:46:44
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Cerberus.Zandra
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Zandra7
Posts: 736
By Cerberus.Zandra 2010-11-11 16:47:14
Link | Citer | R
 
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
Savage plays to his audience well. Those that only want to hear part of the story may enjoy the smooth rants of Savage. He argues like Reverend Wright (although for the other side and to a larger audience) and tells the Fox News-type audience exactly what they want to hear.

You can lump me together into some group and assume I agree with them on everything...but I try to question everything I read rather than taking words at face value :/

lol you guys, where do you get your Obama coolaid?
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:49:50
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Ramuh.Vinvv
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: vinvv
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2010-11-11 16:50:46
Link | Citer | R
 
Cerberus.Zandra said:
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
Savage plays to his audience well. Those that only want to hear part of the story may enjoy the smooth rants of Savage. He argues like Reverend Wright (although for the other side and to a larger audience) and tells the Fox News-type audience exactly what they want to hear.

You can lump me together into some group and assume I agree with them on everything...but I try to question everything I read rather than taking words at face value :/

lol you guys, where do you get your Obama coolaid?
who said I was all about Obama?
OH WAIT...NOBODY DID?
WOW!
and any poor person would be able to tell you it's KOOL-AID damnit!
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:51:49
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
Offline
Posts: 114
By clyclie 2010-11-11 16:54:18
Link | Citer | R
 
hahaha..this is funny...i wonder how many of u decided to vote on the mid -term elections....just so u all know...basically..these tax cuts have nothing to do with us: wont help us at all, now we will never see progress and we will go into a depression. the wealthiest ppl in america made 99% of america's wealth just last year. <ruters and cnn> they made profits of 1.3 trillion last year and obama wanted to tax 3% on the 1.3 trillion actually less than clinton did.<abc news, bill maher and cnn> that 3 percent was gonna go to the ppl...to stimulate the economy jobs etc; we have no middle class. Recession directly effected the area im in. Crime up like almost 40% here...our unemployment is at 11%, national average is 9%...so u guys saying thats its a good thing dont know poverty...white house basically telling us to go work and earn wages below poverty line and hope for the best, those of u on unemployment, it will be suspended on dec 9 <all associated press> even if u have a balance u will recieve no more help...so basically whitehouse telling us to go *** ourselves....really ppl....we messed up by not voting, and u californians, omg u suck, prop 19 would have been 1 thing that would have gotten cali out of debt...wow, just wow. could ve have progressed the country..
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 16:56:46
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Cerberus.Zandra
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Zandra7
Posts: 736
By Cerberus.Zandra 2010-11-11 17:02:32
Link | Citer | R
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said:
Cerberus.Zandra said:
Leviathan.Chaosx said:

Lol thanks, your link just gave me more accurate data.

So in 2001 before the tax cuts took effect jan-dec the rates of unemployment were (1rst half enacted june 2001):
4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7
Bold is june in case you wondered

Then in 2002 & 2003 with them in effect:
5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0

2003 (2nd half enacted May):
5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7
Bold is May.

Ok I was wrong the steady increase took place earlier than I thought.

Don't feel like copying and pasting the rest, but surely look at your link
There's the 20062004-2007 small decrease I mentioned.
Then the huge rise in 2008.

^^ FIXED


EDIT::

lol let me paste it for you. Don't forget that we had a small recession in 2001 which I guess the tax cuts caused if i think i understand what you're saying (don't forget about 9/11 which significantly contributed to it as well).

Oh and way to leave out 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008

2004 - 5.7,5.6,5.8,5.6,5.6,5.6,5.5,5.4,5.4,5.5,5.4,5.4

2005 - 5.2,5.4,5.2,5.2,5.1,5.1,5.0,4.9,5.0,5.0,5.0,4.8

2006 - 4.7,4.8,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.4

2007 - 4.6,4.5,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.6,4.7,4.7,4.7,4.8,4.7,4.9

2008 - 4.9,4.8,5.1,5.0,5.5,5.6,5.8,6.2,6.2,6.6,6.8,7.2

but according to you this had nothing to do with the tax cuts.....


2004?! Lol! End of 2005 a little.

So basically during the best times, the tax cuts brought the numbers down to almost the levels they were before the cuts.

But nothing close to these years:

1998
4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.4

1999
4.3 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0

2000
4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9


Definitely looks like the levels were way better off without the cuts.

lol again, I can't imagine the world you live in. I guess if the unemployment rate is only related to the tax rates and nothing else, you would be right. But adults (and even small children for that matter) realize that the economy is pretty complicated.

However I will still make my original argument that lowering tax rates will help the economy recover, and raising them will hurt it. The data supports it also, in 2001 we lowered taxes in response to a recession and only got a ~6% unemployment rate. In 2009 we spent a trillion dollars on a stimulus in response to a recession and we got a ~10% unemployment rate. Hmm seems like cutting taxes worked much better to me.

Why don't you tell me why we have such a high unemployment rate right now, and why you think it will be lowered if we raise taxes?
 Cerberus.Zandra
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Zandra7
Posts: 736
By Cerberus.Zandra 2010-11-11 17:05:30
Link | Citer | R
 
Pandemonium.Spicyryan said:
Cerberus.Zandra said:
Ramuh.Vinvv said:
Savage plays to his audience well. Those that only want to hear part of the story may enjoy the smooth rants of Savage. He argues like Reverend Wright (although for the other side and to a larger audience) and tells the Fox News-type audience exactly what they want to hear.

You can lump me together into some group and assume I agree with them on everything...but I try to question everything I read rather than taking words at face value :/

lol you guys, where do you get your Obama coolaid?

Right next to the koolaid all the other idiots like you drink.

Who is supporting Obama here? If talking bad about the Tea Party and Republicans in general is supporting Obama you need your head checked. Fortunately we already knew you did because you think the Tea Party is an outstanding movement.

I'm laughing at your poor attempts to troll
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2010-11-11 17:05:37
 Undelete | Link | Citer | R
 
Post deleted by User.
 Ramuh.Vinvv
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: vinvv
Posts: 15542
By Ramuh.Vinvv 2010-11-11 17:06:12
Link | Citer | R
 
Cerberus.Zandra said:
lol again, I can't imagine the world you live in. I guess if the unemployment rate is only related to the tax rates and nothing else, you would be right. But adults (and even small children for that matter) realize that the economy is pretty complicated.

However I will still make my original argument that lowering tax rates will help the economy recover, and raising them will hurt it. The data supports it also, in 2001 we lowered taxes in response to a recession and only got a ~6% unemployment rate. In 2009 we spent a trillion dollars on a stimulus in response to a recession and we got a ~10% unemployment rate. Hmm seems like cutting taxes worked much better to me.

Why don't you tell me why we have such a high unemployment rate right now, and why you think it will be lowered if we raise taxes?
it won't be if we only raise it for the top 1% !!!!
jk what do either of us no.
we can only make speculations and that doesn't really say ***.
 Asura.Baroma
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: baroma
Posts: 437
By Asura.Baroma 2010-11-11 17:06:25
Link | Citer | R
 
The question everyone needs to answer for themselves, Who makes better decisions on how to spend your earned income. You or your governemnt. That's all, no politics, just plain choice.

When Social Security first came out, we all thought the money would be in a "lockbox" until we reach a certain age.where did it go?

I could've used that extra money to set asside for my own retirement account, control where to invest it. Now I'm still setting asside money PLUS giving money to SS. So who really knows best how to save money?
First Page 2 3 4 5 ... 18 19 20