|
Random Arguments & Strawmen #15
By Ramyrez 2016-12-07 14:52:06
You mean the same thing you did about Trump?
No, I don't mean the same thing. I am not mischaracterizing his words. He walked back his words at a later date.
A more apt comparison would be Hillary's deplorables comment.
By fonewear 2016-12-07 14:52:41
So much hyperbole I can't tell who is more full of ***...it's a tough call !
By fonewear 2016-12-07 14:53:26
Nazis here Obama greatest president ever over there and Trump eating tacos on a gold plate way over there.
By fonewear 2016-12-07 14:56:56
We've hit a new low ladies and gentlemen
Stuff could happen it probably won't but it could !
So everyone panic !
By Ramyrez 2016-12-07 14:57:21
I never said Obama was the greatest president. Just like I never said GWB was the greatest president.
But I also don't go around comparing either of them to tinpot dictators.
[+]
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-12-07 14:59:18
None of the fears you have with Trump will ever come to light, because of the way this country is set up. In order for Hitler to do the things he wanted, he had to first destroy/take over the German parliament. Which he did.
The point isn't "will it happen?"
It's extremely unlikely.
The point is the president elect of the US is using Nazi policies to draw voters and it worked.So did Obama. They were both using the anger of the voters to rise to power. They were both charismatic enough to mislead the population into putting them into power, then pulling the bait-and-switch tactic to push agendas that nobody voted them into power for.
They also liked to over-dramatize everything. Hope and Change you can believe in!
[+]
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-12-07 15:00:26
But I also don't go around comparing either of them to tinpot dictators. No, you just compare president-elects to tinpot dictators.
By Ramyrez 2016-12-07 15:01:09
But I also don't go around comparing either of them to tinpot dictators. No, you just compare president-elects to tinpot dictators.
No I *** didn't. I joked about it with Nik's response and you launched into your hur-hur-hur we've had eight years of it already thing.
By Ramyrez 2016-12-07 15:01:51
What, precisely, Nazi propaganda did BO use again?
Bahamut.Ravael
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2016-12-07 15:02:25
The point is the president elect of the US is using Nazi policies to draw voters and it worked.
Holy crap, enough of this. The point of why comparing things to Nazis/Hitler is so unreasonable is it's an intellectually deficient way of approaching an argument.
Q: Who's the worst person you can think of?
A: Hitler
Q: Who are you automatically going to draw connections to when you don't like someone?
A: Hitler
It's confirmation bias. Even with the most insidious interpretation of Trump's proposed (and retracted) registry, it had little to do with why Nazis kept registries. Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. It wasn't a desire to systematically deny rights and eventually eradicate all "inferior beings".
By fonewear 2016-12-07 15:03:22
Comparing Hitler to Hitler is even childish and boring !
[+]
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-12-07 15:04:24
What, precisely, Nazi propaganda did BO use again? Nice strawman:
Here's your argument again
The point is the president elect of the US is using Nazi policies to draw voters and it worked.
I guess I should have elaborated to state that Hitler's rhetoric and dramatic prowess is the same methods Obama used.
You are confusing policies with propaganda again.
By Ramyrez 2016-12-07 15:04:33
It's confirmation bias. Even with the most insidious interpretation of Trump's proposed (and retracted) registry, it had little to do with why Nazis kept registries. Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. It wasn't a desire to systematically deny rights and eventually eradicate all "inferior beings".
Because I'm sure that's how it started before. Exactly like that.
You know for a guy who supposedly was elected on so many American values and principles it's amazing how people are willing to let him piss all over them.
[+]
By fonewear 2016-12-07 15:04:40
The only real way to compare Presidents is comparing them to other Presidents it's a novel concept indeed.
By Ramyrez 2016-12-07 15:05:30
I guess I should have elaborated to state that Hitler's rhetoric and dramatic prowess is the same methods Obama used.
You are confusing policies with propaganda again.
I'm really not. You're being pedantic to try to get out of being wrong, which is your kind way of reminding people an argument is over with you and you're just going to harass people with semantics until they say something mean to you so you can complain to the mods.
Forum Moderator
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 29745
By Asura.Dameshi 2016-12-07 15:05:34
Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. Ends don't always justify the means. Just because something is deemed "for national security" doesn't mean it is always morally, ethically, or even politically correct.
I'm speaking generally here, btw.
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-12-07 15:05:38
are, not is.
Damn you Rooks! Don't make me a Grammar Nazi here!
By fonewear 2016-12-07 15:06:25
Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. Ends don't always justify the means. Just because something is deemed "for national security" doesn't mean it is always morally, ethically, or even politically correct.
I'm speaking generally here, btw.
We gave up morals and ethics a long time ago they got in the way !
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-12-07 15:06:52
Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. Ends don't always justify the means. Just because something is deemed "for national security" doesn't mean it is always morally, ethically, or even politically correct.
I'm speaking generally here, btw. Bad Mod! *whacks with newspaper*
You aren't supposed to bring discussion to this thread, you are supposed to ban people you don't agree with just on that premise!
Rooks! You aren't teaching your mods right again!
Valefor.Sehachan
Serveur: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2016-12-07 15:07:32
I'm speaking generally here, btw. Sure... *wonders what is happening among the ffxiah staff..*
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2016-12-07 15:07:43
Because I'm sure that's how it started before. Exactly like that.
Yeah, and they both started as babies. Exactly like that. First they start walking, then they start talking, then they murder 6 million people.
[+]
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-12-07 15:07:55
I guess I should have elaborated to state that Hitler's rhetoric and dramatic prowess is the same methods Obama used.
You are confusing policies with propaganda again.
I'm really not. You're being pedantic to try to get out of being wrong, which is your kind way of reminding people an argument is over with you and you're just going to harass people with semantics until they say something mean to you so you can complain to the mods. You are being obtuse and trying to go back on your own mistakes!
...let's just end this.
Bahamut.Ravael
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2016-12-07 15:08:23
Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. Ends don't always justify the means. Just because something is deemed "for national security" doesn't mean it is always morally, ethically, or even politically correct.
I'm speaking generally here, btw.
I never said it was correct. I'm pointing out how stupid it is to Godwin over it.
[+]
By Ramyrez 2016-12-07 15:08:49
Because I'm sure that's how it started before. Exactly like that.
Yeah, and they both started as babies. Exactly like that. First they start walking, then they start talking, then they murder 6 million people.
Yes, please. Continue with flippant answers to discredit what I'm saying.
Don't admit to yourself that we elected a guy because we placed money over his very flawed, very problematic policies on everything else.
By eliroo 2016-12-07 15:09:45
Phoenix.Xantavia
Serveur: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 449
By Phoenix.Xantavia 2016-12-07 15:09:51
It's one thing that Person A is in a situation where they are in between jobs and/or learning new skills for the next big job, it's another if they choose to live that life. I'm all for taxing those who choose to live at or around the poverty line. That might be incentive enough for them to get out of poverty, or at least attempt to. Do you really think people choose to live paycheck to paycheck, having to choose between food or having the power on? Granted, a poor choice or two may have put them in that situation, but it is a downward spiral and getting out isn't always possible. When you have no money, moving where the jobs are isn't an option. There is no money to pay for education to expand your skills for a better job. Or you are working 2-3 jobs with an ever-changing schedule which leaves no time to do anything even if you can scrape up the funds to pay for something.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael
Serveur: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13640
By Bahamut.Ravael 2016-12-07 15:10:36
Because I'm sure that's how it started before. Exactly like that.
Yeah, and they both started as babies. Exactly like that. First they start walking, then they start talking, then they murder 6 million people.
Yes, please. Continue with flippant answers to discredit what I'm saying.
Don't admit to yourself that we elected a guy because we placed money over his very flawed, very problematic policies on everything else.
Don't change the subject. I've been aware of Trump's flaws from Day 1.
Logical fallacies are bad. You're better than that.
By fonewear 2016-12-07 15:10:48
It's one thing that Person A is in a situation where they are in between jobs and/or learning new skills for the next big job, it's another if they choose to live that life. I'm all for taxing those who choose to live at or around the poverty line. That might be incentive enough for them to get out of poverty, or at least attempt to. Do you really think people choose to live paycheck to paycheck, having to choose between food or having the power on? Granted, a poor choice or two may have put them in that situation, but it is a downward spiral and getting out isn't always possible. When you have no money, moving where the jobs are isn't an option. There is no money to pay for education to expand your skills for a better job. Or you are working 2-3 jobs with an ever-changing schedule which leaves no time to do anything even if you can scrape up the funds to pay for something.
It's an easy solution stop being poor.
Forum Moderator
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 29745
By Asura.Dameshi 2016-12-07 15:10:59
Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. Ends don't always justify the means. Just because something is deemed "for national security" doesn't mean it is always morally, ethically, or even politically correct.
I'm speaking generally here, btw. Bad Mod! *whacks with newspaper*
You aren't supposed to bring discussion to this thread, you are supposed to ban people you don't agree with just on that premise!
Rooks! You aren't teaching your mods right again! I was brought in as an outsider to shake up the status quo of mods. I'm turning it upside down!
Even if the proposal could be determined to be unconstitutional or *gasp* bigoted, it was based on a desire for national security. Ends don't always justify the means. Just because something is deemed "for national security" doesn't mean it is always morally, ethically, or even politically correct.
I'm speaking generally here, btw.
I never said it was correct. I'm pointing out how stupid it is to Godwin over it. It's okay, I'm playing devil's advocate, maybe. Or something.
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2016-12-07 15:11:36
Because I'm sure that's how it started before. Exactly like that.
Yeah, and they both started as babies. Exactly like that. First they start walking, then they start talking, then they murder 6 million people.
Yes, please. Continue with flippant answers to discredit what I'm saying.
Don't admit to yourself that we elected a guy because we placed money over his very flawed, very problematic policies on everything else. That's not why he won, btw.
People were apparent against his policies, even those on the same party. He didn't win because of that. (Not saying he didn't get votes because of that, I'm saying that was not a driving force in his victory)
He won because it was a testament against politicians and the liberal "elite" who ignore everyone that doesn't fall in their "preferred" category.
You are basically stating that all Trump voters are racist because Trump won.
[+]
|
|