Random Politics & Religion #09

]Not taking a side here[/b] because I think it's a questionable move at best.

That said, a thoughtful discussion could be had (it won't be, but I'll try anyhow):

Shooter's father is not the shooter, everyone is responsible for their own behavior and no one else's. Father has to deal with the fallout of the horrible things his own son did and has to question whether or not he should even mourn the loss of his own son due to his son's terrible acts.

Personal responsibility vs. guilt by association.

Political ploy? Reaching out to someone who is likely grieving and struggling with how/if he even should? An attempt at healing?

Which is it?

Personally I don't think it's a slap in the face to anyone, especially anyone calling for forgiveness and healing in the face of terrible events. But I'm not in any "community" that's "marginalized" to really say, I guess.

I tried and failed much like Hillary. But I don't have the media to ignore me 24/7 !

It's simple cause most of the media works for Hillary. And they do her bidding.

And here I thought they worked for the Zionist overlords that controlled all aspects of everyday life.

Might want to tell a certain conspiracy theorist the real truth, Fone.

'Why does the media ignore Clinton!', said unironically during a discussion of a news media story about Clinton.

'Why does the media ignore Clinton!', said unironically during a discussion of a news media story about Clinton.

It isn't a half baked conspiracy theory. Turn on CNN for example and find me a story that makes Hillary look bad I'll wait.

But there is no media bias in this election, nosiree!

Trump declares war on Democrats, tells 2nd Amendment radicals to shoot up homes

It looks like the title was modified, because taking a very ambiguous comment and using it to claim that Trump is advocating gun massacres is absolutely insane, even for CNN.

Original Title is: Trump: 'Second Amendment people' could thwart Clinton

Trump declares war on Democrats, tells 2nd Amendment radicals to shoot up homes

But it's the left that has issues with hyperbole

But it's the left that has issues with hyperbole

yeah, he could of meant ANYTHING by what he said. that's the core problem with him. a presidential candidate should maybe try to make unambiguous statements that can't be misconstrued as "kill this person.". maybe it's the stuff he says, not a massive conspiracy.

But hey, at least we proven something here.

When the left makes a mountain out of a molehill, it's sensationalism and therefor ok.

When the right or a conservative uses sensationalism as an example, it's therefor hyperbole and not ok (unless the left uses it, then it's ok).

If a conservative breathes, they are taking up the air from every lefty there is, and therefor bad, and they should be ashamed!

Better question should be:

Why does the media ignore every issue with Clinton, and yet, attack Trump on even the most farfetched and most likely made up story by 3rd parties?

Or are you going to say that you heard Trump specifically state that he will nuke Iran on the first day he is President?

How the rat stumbled through the maze and found that piece of cheese I'll never know

Trump is like the poster boy of making up farfetched stories with no actual proof. And when there is actual proof that goes against him, it suddenly becomes "he never said that" or "he was just joking. You don't understand".