Asura.Ericka said:
can it also be use for chemical warfare?
with all the other safe non dangerous sources of power that can be use to bring power to homes businesses etc, why have such a powerful element that can kill ppl, wildlife etc?
isn't there other options for power/electricity?
reading up on the russian explosion has me a bit paranoid about the subject.
That would be radiological warfare and there are alot more efficient ways to go about it.
And what non dangerous sources of power? All of them have decent risks and non of them have the amount of safety percautions associated with them.
This is cheaper, smaller, and much more efficient form of energy. It also happens to be one of the cleaniest and have one of the best track records. The number of nuclear accidents including ones that didn't release anything at all in recorded history is only a few dozen. Compare that to how many horribly things have happened with alot of other stuff... in fact iirc under normal operations coal burning plants actually release much much much more radioactive elements. Pretty much the only cheaper ones are the ones that we have killed due to regulation since they are so bad for the environment.
And Chernobyl is by far far far the worst ever. The next worst was once again russian and even farther back in history. And after that are ones with a few deaths a little bit of possible exposure to the public.