How about Shinheuh then? "God Sea Aquatic Animals"
Or Shinsoo, "Divine Water". It's not water though, it's pretty much everything.
Quote:
A supernatural energy that flows through the Tower. Each Floor has areas of varying amounts of Shinsoo density, increasing with each floor. In lower concentrations, its' density makes the substance act like a gas, but in higher concentrations, it behaves like a liquid.
At different times, Shinsoo can take on the properties of water, fire, air, or light, etc. Shinsoo has an endless list of variations. As it can be so many different things, nothing can be singled out to define Shinsoo or to assign it with a special property. Shinsoo is the "basis of all energy".
This can also be manipulated to create weapons, attack with, give immortality to people with great enough control over it. Some technique names and things like Shinheuh and Shinsoo can't really be translated.
How about Shinheuh then? "God Sea Aquatic Animals"
Or Shinsoo, "Divine Water". It's not water though, it's pretty much everything.
Quote:
A supernatural energy that flows through the Tower. Each Floor has areas of varying amounts of Shinsoo density, increasing with each floor. In lower concentrations, its' density makes the substance act like a gas, but in higher concentrations, it behaves like a liquid.
At different times, Shinsoo can take on the properties of water, fire, air, or light, ect. Shinsoo has an endless list of variations. As it can be so many different things, nothing can be singled out to define Shinsoo or to assign it with a special property. Shinsoo is the "basis of all energy".
This can also be manipulated to create weapons, attack with, give immortality to people with great enough control over it. Some technique names and things like Shinheuh and Shinsoo can't really be translated.
Shinheuh - seems like it's a person's name? God of the Sea? (edit: did a quick google search. I would translate this as "The Divine Creatures" or something like that.)
Shinsoo - from your explanation, I'd translate it as something like "The Divine Element" or something like that.
It's not a person's name. They are creatures in the tower.
The creatures that live and depend on Shinsoo. While the literal translation does mean "aquatic animal", in the view where Shinsoo is characterized as water and Shinsoo fills everything, you are technically always within the figurative sea of Shinsoo. So, it really means any and all creatures in The Tower which includes species like Mangdol Whales, White Steel Eel, Striped Ground Pig.
Wolhaiksong (월하익송, Weolhaiksong; most likely 月下翼松, yue4 xia4 yi4 song1, "The Winged Tree Under the Moon"; ), or the Wing Tree (윙트리, Wingteuri) is a independent organisation (NGO) in the Tower which resides in the 77th Floor.
If SIU wanted to use an ambiguous term like “tree”, he would’ve used 木나무 목(mu4, nahmoo/namu). Or perhaps "樹, 나무 수(shu4, nahmoo/namu soo/su)". In Mandarin, both "木(mu4)" and "樹(shu4)" refer to tree. However, he specifically used "松, 소나무, 송(song1, soo/su namu, song)" where “松”; “소나무”, "송" mean “pine tree” in Mandarin/Korean. And SIU didn’t use any other botanical terms to describe the Wolhaiksong.
So, SIU is probably alluding to several imageries or meanings. The first being: the form of a tree with wings in place of branches resembles a pine tree. Note the resemblance of the Wolhaiksong symbol to a pine tree and he's probably not talking about the actual tree in this sense. The other meanings are unknown for the time being.
Also, Mandarin is very heavy on context and tends to "drop" characters so a name/phrase/sentence becomes shorter and sometimes, more elegant. So translating directly isn't always advisable. Or else, the result would be something like “Under the moon, a pine tree with wings or a winged pine tree.” Neither makes any sense as trees can't grow wings.
Also, there are often different ways of describing the first imagery(not the full context) and below are just a few examples. And the English transcription is somewhat literal, to grasp at the context.
月下的树。那棵有翅膀的树,非常相似松树。(yue4 xia4 de shu4. na4 ke you3 chi4 bang3 de shu4, fei1 chang3 xiang1 si4 song1 shu4) Tree under the moon. The tree which has "wings", very much "resembles" a pine tree.
When "tree" is first mentioned, the context is ambiguous. Only until "tree" is mentioned a second time, does the reader know the topic is talking about a singular tree, out of multiple trees.
Tree standing under the moon seems as though only has "wings", so these "wings" very much "resemble" the branches of a pine tree.
However, this sentence is even more ambiguous because it never defines if the tree is singular or multiple. Only through other context, can one arrive at the conclusion it's referring to a single tree.
My point is that professional translators very rarely include this stuff and just translate it as something, without explaining why they chose that word and what the original means or why the author chose to use those specific characters etc
My point is that professional translators very rarely include this stuff and just translate it as something, without explaining why they chose that word and what the original means or why the author chose to use those specific characters etc
If you want there to be notes ok, I agree. But I really don't think words should be left untranslated unless they're made up terms.
I believe what Drac is driving at is how translating things poorly leads to poor conveyance. Conveyance is what's important, and in this case the lack of translating words is also stylistic.
My point is that professional translators very rarely include this stuff and just translate it as something, without explaining why they chose that word and what the original means or why the author chose to use those specific characters etc
If you want there to be notes ok, I agree. But I really don't think words should be left untranslated unless they're made up terms.
If there is an accurate translation (that doesn't sound odd) for it then I don't mind them using that word but if it's something that doesn't translate well or doesn't sound good, I prefer them just leaving it as it is. Such as Rasengan or Chidori. Honorifics aren't really needed and you can include those in small notes, like if someone is addressed as -sama they can mention it in the space between panels.
No, no, no. It's just feels that way cause for a non japanese person japanese words sound cooler than they are in his own language. Just like sometimes japanese characters use english names for abilities for no *** reason(in fantasy worlds where english isn't even a thing!)
It's like Kalyna says, if I read BLEACH for the first time and see "his Reiatsu is really strong" my first thought would be "yeah, and my Opel struggles uphill".
No, no, no. It's just feels that way cause for a non japanese person japanese words sound cooler than they are in his own language. Just like sometimes japanese characters use english names for abilities for no *** reason(in fantasy worlds where english isn't even a thing!)
It's like Kalyna says, if I read BLEACH for the first time and see "his Reiatsu is really strong" my first thought would be "yeah, and my Opel struggles uphill".
In the case of localizations it is, and in the case of Tower of God, it is stylistic. The author is choosing very specific words and terms to convey concepts. Even for an everyday speaker it is a far departure from typical vernacular.
I could see if a word uses sounds the person was incapable of using, like some Afrikaans words I could never say accurately. But for most words I come across it's not hard to just pronounce them the way the creator of the show intended instead of reading the word on paper and for fun, pronouncing it however I want.
gets annoying and makes the dub actor sound stupid for no reason
They do it to make it easier on the audience. Names already have a foreign sound to them, so they ease it up as they can(if it's a right choice though is highly debatable.
Going by the above example, italian dubbers say Narùto and Sasùke instead of Nàruto and Sàs-ke.
This is a thread that I found on another website I post at. It can be really really interesting. I thought it deserved a place here.
Post your random thoughts for the day here, or anything else that intrigues you.
For starters, is it possible to give constructive critism to someone who doesn't have a neck? I totally just walked by a girl who didn't. Someone isn't getting a necklace for Valentines day!
And who decided black and white can't be colors? I want to say a racist. I really do.