Its self evident that you have no clue what a fascist is. Btw your cast is the useful idiot, brown shirts if you like. They were the first ones to meet the gas chamber FYI.
It's not a clam; it's fact
I don't "hate" anyone
People ARE mostly unintelligent, by design (it's on purpose)
It's not disparaging, it's being honest.
Threatening someone is a bannable offense. Not my rule, it's their rule. I can't ban anyone.
Efficiency is logic, it is optimal.
We would be better as a species "eliminating" the ones who lower the bar, as it were.
I break the "standards" to highlight the flaws. Thats the optimal method of exposure.
It's not a clam; it's fact
I don't "hate" anyone
People ARE mostly unintelligent, by design (it's on purpose)
It's not disparaging, it's being honest.
Threatening someone is a bannable offense. Not my rule, it's their rule. I can't ban anyone.
Efficiency is logic, it is optimal.
We would be better as a species "eliminating" the ones who lower the bar, as it were.
I break the "standards" to highlight the flaws. Thats the optimal method of exposure.
Everything you just said is fascist. You just confirmed again my statement as valid, you are choking on the blue pill so hard you don't even know wtf you are. Very sad.
Yea I'm gonna practice my fascist rights and just block you now. It's very clear to me, I can't change your mind, and pretty much over reading your double speak and picking it apart for you.
What's new in the riot news? I hear covid is spiking, even in my town now, last few weeks have seen double the cases since they started/relaxed quarantine.
Seems like the perfect storm, these riots and the active virus.
I hate to break this to you, but no one is "tearing anyone apart" in any shape or form.
You're making your own storylines up and arguing with yourself.
The last thing I'm going to explain on fascism vs what I mention.
You have 100 people of all races on a boat. Fascists want to throw the blacks overboard because they're black.
I want to throw the 50 that are literally setting the boat on fire, overboard. Not because they're black, or brown, or Muslim, but because they're literally trying to bring the entire boat down.
This isn't an opinion, this isn't "I'm better than you" this isn't arbitrary. This is just logic.
Except what you consider "literally setting the boat on fire" is going to differ wildly from one person to the next. But hey, go ahead and publish what constitutes a murderable offense "for the betterment of society". It'll fit quite nicely on the shelf at a library next to Mein Kampf.
Except what you consider "literally setting the boat on fire" is going to differ wildly from one person to the next. But hey, go ahead and publish what constitutes a murderable offense "for the betterment of society". It'll fit quite nicely on the shelf at a library next to Mein Kampf.
Can't have libraries, they aren't efficient use of what could be more boot making time.
It's really not. Betterment is betterment. Wholesale.
There is no opinion on what constitutes it. You can disagree, no one forces you to be correct.
"Betterment" is an opinion, genius. And you'd be hard pressed to convince people that a society that is comfortable with the wholesale murder of "inferiors" is in any way "better" than what we have now. You'd think differently if they determined that it was you who deserved to have his head on the chopping block, Mr. Robespierre.
His social programs the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution are two of the most ill-fated, poorly named, initiatives ever. The first was an effort to rapidly industrialize China. His focus was on making China a premier exporter of steel, and to this end he asked everybody to make it. The problem was it got many citizens to make smelting shops in their backyards. Not only was the steel of little value, but it was made from everything lying around the house including their own cooking supplies! Without the tools to make food, no money coming in from the steel, and no money to survive ~ a lot of people starved to death. The estimates on this program alone are 20 million deaths! Think about that number. Really think about it. Then ask yourself… why would you EVER let someone back into power after such an insanely bad decision.Well, they took the reigns away from him for a short time.
Hello BLM/ANTIFA tactics In the interim Mao started the socialist education movement. He aimed the concept at young ones who would eventually wrest the power away from the older guard. By 1964 this movement was renamed the “four cleanups movement” whose goal was cleansing politics, economics, ideas, and organization of “reactionaries”. This led to the formation of the “Red Guards” who were organized to punish intellectuals and take out Mao’s political adversaries. The Cultural Revolution was now underway, and its overriding mission was to abolish: Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas. Something Mao fervently believed in was that destruction and chaos could bring re-birth. So he told his followers to destroy buildings, sacred objects, talk back to ones elders, punish them, turn them in, and kill those who did not agree. By 1968 things were starting to look pretty good for Mao all over again, and so he put into place the decade long “Down to the Countryside Movement” which forced young intellectuals to move out to the country to become farmers. Sadly, the people he pushed out there were the same Red Guards who had helped him get power. Estimates of the death toll are between 40,000 – 7 million depending on who you ask.
Finally, there is the 100 flowers movement which just needs an abbreviated mention here. Mao asked people to come forth and tell him how he should govern China. Intellectuals and liberals bit at the chance to tell him what they really thought, and were encouraged by the Communist party to do so. Then in a sudden change of heart, or an incredibly crafty mission to out his haters, the government persecuted 500,000 of them who were considered to be “dangerous thinkers”.
Betterment, is not subjective. If we take every person with downs, and throw them in a volcano. Nothing of value is lost. yeah, that's mean and it'll hurt your feelings. But, now we have to devote zero resources to people with downs. The entire society is bettered as a whole. Some sacrifices were made, for the greater good.
It's not the worst thing that could happen. It wouldn't take complete eradication. We could lose a few billion and come out ahead. Plus selective castration/breeding, advance the species etc
Advance just how?
If monkeys were to design a super monkey they would never come up with homo sap.