I think you missed the point. The criticism of Donald Trump borderlines on the extreme. I push back to what I view as reality. If the criticism was based on reality (and there is plenty of material there), I wouldn't defend against it as much.
How am I not above it all?
Just because you're not Team America Democrat/Republican doesn't mean you're a paragon of unbiased criticism yourself. You're an admitted troll who makes incendiary comments. If you want a real discussion you have a lot to make up for. You reap what you sow, Professor.
What is 'not reality' about the one specific thing which I cited, that you yourself have stated is from the minutes of a meeting? It is indefensible to any intelligent, rational and non unhealthily obsessed person, yet you defend it still.
You can pretend I am biased if you want believe that in order to justify your own delusional bias. However, it is not simply bias that I am calling out. You clearly can't comprehend the difference between simple bias and irrationally defending someone who does not even gain from your defense.
As I already have tried to explain to you, your inability to differentiate between blatantly provokative posts and actual posting is not my fault. It is rather ironic that you repeatedly aim posts at me and spend time replying multiple times to my every post... while pretending you are not really giving a serious effort, person of unspecified job title.