Random Politics & Religion #36
|
Random Politics & Religion #36
Hell they would probably kill JFK all over again cause he doesn't believe in global warming !
[+]
All you got to understand about a liberal is they are the opposite of everything they say.
And if you don't agree with them you are a racist bigot sum *** that probably drives a Ford pick up truck. With a NRA bumper sticker.
[+]
They argue with emotion not logic or reason. You can't reason with a liberal.
Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Viciouss said: » Oh, suing the press, he won't get a dime. Hell, he is hitting WaPo first, Bezos isn't Trump he isn't going to settle this off court, kid is going to learn a harsh reality. His case will just be dismissed, he doesn't have one. Suing the First Amendment always fails. libel
[lahy-buh l] | SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR libel ON THESAURUS.COM noun Law . defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures. the act or crime of publishing it. a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge. anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents. verb (used with object), li·beled, li·bel·ing or (especially British) li·belled, li·bel·ling. to publish a libel against. to misrepresent damagingly. to institute suit against by a libel, as in an admiralty court.
[+]
This is just for sexual false allegations there Vic.
Brent E. Turvey, a criminologist, wrote a 2017 book that dispels this notion. His research, and that of two co-authors, cited statistical studies and police crime reports. One academic study showed that as many as 40 percent of sexual assault charges are false. Source: WaPos I"m glad you guys are internet lawyers. Next time I need legal advice I'll come here to FFXIAH.
Where did you get your law degree a Cracker Jack box ?
Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Libel doesn't hold up in court unless you can prove they published the stories knowing they were false. Which clearly does not fit this instance. Its just a stunt for the alt-right. Goin nowhere. Bahamut.Ravael said: » And you can rail on Christians all you want, but it's not like liberals are any better at practicing what they preach. Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Odin.Slore said: » libel [lahy-buh l] | SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR libel ON THESAURUS.COM noun Law . defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures. the act or crime of publishing it. a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge. anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents. verb (used with object), li·beled, li·bel·ing or (especially British) li·belled, li·bel·ling. to publish a libel against. to misrepresent damagingly. to institute suit against by a libel, as in an admiralty court. Libel doesn't hold up in court unless you can prove they published the stories knowing they were false. The Washington Post ignored basic journalistic standards because it wanted to advance its well-known and easily documented biased agenda against President Donald J. Trump.
[+]
Most likely the Jeff Bozo paper will settle with him out of court cause it is cheaper than paying the lawyers to defend it.
Viciouss said: » I apologize I was fighting ad blocker popups. Information still stands. How the hell do you dismiss a 3 person crime study as politically motivated? You *** about Nausi blowing off all facts shown him but you do the same exact thing. Hypocrite much? Nausi said: » The Washington Post ignored basic journalistic standards because it wanted to advance its well-known and easily documented biased agenda against President Donald J. Trump. If true, this is perfectly legal. Somehow they translate "love they neighbor" into things like, "Force successful people to give away a huge portion of everything they earn to be portioned out by an inherently corrupt system to people that are most likely to vote to keep said system in power forever. Oh, and don't get mad when they want to murder near-full-term babies because of emotional inconvenience. Because love. Or something."
[+]
Odin.Slore said: » Viciouss said: » I apologize I was fighting ad blocker popups. Information still stands. How the hell do you dismiss a 3 person crime study as politically motivated? You *** about Nausi blowing off all facts shown him but you do the same exact thing. Hypocrite much? lol, because its the Washington Times. Notice how they didn't actually share the study? They just talked about it. Whats the point of this anyway? Nausi said: » Yeah, we were just talking about how the lawsuit is bound for dismissal. The WaPo did nothing wrong. Nausi said: » lol, yes it is. All they have to do is report what they believe is the truth, and label Op-Eds as such, and done! First Amendment is tough, I know. Who the hell reads the Amazon Post. The only use for that newspaper is for potty training your dog. ***all over the facts I don't like.
[+]
Jeff is like the guy in Citizen Cane he can't be President so the next best thing is to own a newspaper.
Citizen Kane *
Well, hopefully we can all agree on the Supreme Court's decision to limit civil forfeiture. That crap was getting out of hand.
[+]
|
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.