Random Politics & Religion #23 (Fake News)

That won't stop his mad armchair detective skills.

Yes, yes you are. Everyday.

Absolutely we should. But which is more pressing the actions of a previous president or the actions of a current one?

You don't need evidence to suspect someone of wrongdoing. You need evidence to accuse someone of wrongdoing, which is what the Left is doing in spite of having no evidence.

And there are several "full investigations" going on, so what are you talking about? I'm fairly sure that I can speak for fellow conservatives here by saying we want the investigations to continue. We're just sick of it being drug out indefinitely with an endless barrage of false narratives.

Because it makes such accusations more meaningful?

I mean, I could accuse you of rape of a minor. By your standards of presenting evidence, just the accusation is enough to condemn you as a rapist. Now, go register to your county as a sex offender and make sure to stay away from schools, you beast.

Would you like it to be accused of something all the time?

Not yet. 2-3 more months!

There is plenty of evidence to warrant an investigation, from all of Team Trump's contacts with Russia, to his business ties, to his very own comments, to the very real hacks of the DNC and RNC, to Wikileaks. The investigations will continue for a long time, Congress has said there is way more information to sift through than they thought, and they are asking for even more information from Trump, and if he is smart he will agree to cooperate or they will just subpoena it like they did Flynn.

Well since we've investigated this current president for the past 10 months and found nothing.

Time to move on no?

4 more years say it with me now 4 more years !

ftfy.

*found plenty of things.

Rooks.

Hard to continue an investigation if he keeps firing the people doing it. Also hard to trust that the investigation is being fully supported if he keeps firing the people doing it.

Oh ***, not sure if you are talking about Hillary's Emails or Trumps investigation.

Another Senate hearing today going badly for Trump. I wonder what his temperature is.

What contacts? 3 people, 1 of which was never affiliated or even talked to Trump himself, do not make a team (in this sense).

You heard it here folks. To Vic, it's warrants a federal investigation to have a business, implying that it is illegal to be an owner of a business. Next thing you know, he is going to demand subpoenas for anyone who owns a car!

Pelosi: We have to pass the bill in order to read it!
Obama: If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
Obama: If I had a son, it would be (Treyvon Martin).

Where are all the federal investigations over every single democrat/liberal in existence?

Are you implying that Trump had anything to do with those hacks?

Are you implying that Trump had anything to do with Wikileaks?

Source, or are you talking out of your *** again?

Yeah, like any other witchhunt. Next thing you know, they are going to see if he weighs the same as a duck.

Sigh, and I was trying so hard to avoid saying this....

FALSE EQUIVALENCE

You have evidence stating that Trump fired Comey because he was investigating Trump and not because Comey is an inept director?

Taking from KNs book of ways to misuse logical fallacies?

There is no false equivalence here just your confirmation bias blinding you from the truth.

Like I said, armchair detective.

You should probably wait until the hearing takes place before making judgement like that....

That had nothing to do with what I said. Go back, pull your head out of your *** and reread it.

What I meant is that we want the investigations to be thorough. I didn't mean we want them to continue indefinitely if after all this time there isn't anything there.

Whatever you say, bub.

Would this help any better?

FALLACY OF INCONSISTENCY!

Its been going on for at least an hour.

Ok, let me ask you this again:

You have evidence stating that Trump fired Comey because he was investigating Trump and not because Comey is an inept director?

And it's still going on.

If Maddow were to state that she has Trump's tax returns, you would state that he didn't pay any taxes before her show even aired.

That actually made me laugh out loud, thank you for that. If you can't tell the difference between the Trump and Clinton investigations then you don't have a clue about what has happened in either one.