Random Politics & Religion #19

If republicans didn't constantly threaten to take away civil rights like abortion and homosexual rights there would be no need to talk about these things. Imagine how beautiful a constructive political debate centered entirely around economics!

not the dems

Ron "Comb on Over" Wyden

Glad you understand, now maybe if you would stop focusing on 2016 and 2020 you might also understand that the current WH is mirred in scandal that they, not the media or dems, created all on their own. Fantasizing about future elections while Trump is in the gutter just adds to the amusement.

... the current WH is mirred in scandal that they, not the media or dems, created all on their own....

Yeah, literally everything is self-inflicted, no involvement from the Dems/media. Like the 100% fake dossier. And the removing of the bust of MLK that never left. Or the reports of mass resignations at the State Department out of protest of Trump's presidency... except for the fact that Trump asked for their resignations, but that's not as exciting.

And that's just getting started. Yup, no input from the Dems/media at all.

... Like the 100% fake dossier....

The dossier has since been partly corroborated, debunking that "100% fake" lie.

But the intercepts do confirm that some of the conversations described in the dossier took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier, according to the officials. CNN has not confirmed whether any content relates to then-candidate Trump.

If you are getting started, perhaps you could continue with actual things that happened? The dossier has since been partly corroborated, debunking that "100% fake" lie. A lot of people have indeed left federal agencies because of Trump's ignorance, only the top positions are appointees.

So, how many people resigned because of Trump? Can you give us a number (not pulled out of where the sun doesn't shine, I mean).

Parts of it are real. Its a typical intel dossier. Sorry you don't like it.

Can you give us a number

No.

The other big ignored part is who told Flynn to talk to the Russians?

... The Obama administration rule required the Social Security Administration to send in the names of beneficiaries with mental impairments who also have a third party manage their benefits..../quote]
So we aren't talking talking garden variety weirdos here, we are talking ones too loopy to handle their own affairs.

Yeah, half-truths are totally legit if they serve your purpose. I have a dossier saying that you're part human, part goat. It got one thing right, so it's no big deal.

Like I said, sorry it hurts your feelings that Trump has been lying the entire time about his connections to Russia. Harping on an intel dossier when we know his campaign was talking to Russia the entire campaign is getting you places. I'm sure that Flynn testimony will help your cause.

I find it hilarious that people think something will come of this.

I suspect that Flynn's testimony will damn Trump and wind up with both of them being hung for treason.

Yeah, half-truths are totally legit if they serve your purpose. I have a dossier saying that you're part human, part goat. It got one thing right, so it's no big deal.

The Hail Mary failed so back to downplaying huh?

I suspect that Flynn's testimony will damn Trump and wind up with both of them being hung for treason.

...

Have you really missed what I'm doing here? Think about it and get back to me.

But in good news for gun sales and bleeding headlines ...

Congress blocks rule barring mentally impaired from guns
CNN

Excerpt:


As always with facts I don't like cnn they twist the story. It is not about mentally handicapped people owning guns. If you read the actual accurate story and read the bill, it covers people with a representative payee. Let me explain this in simple terms. If you are on social security or disability and you have a representative payee, which means for one reason or another you have someone managing your money. This can be for any reason. My cousin is my uncles payee, who receives social security retirement. Before all this he was not able to purchase a gun because obama drew all the info from social security and said if you are incapable of managing your own finances with needing a representative payee, then your not competent to own a gun. My Uncle has a payee because he lost both his legs to diabetes and he cannot drive so my cousin manages his finances. Does this make him mentally incompetent? Hell no. Under obamas law he cannot own a gun, he tried and came up on list that is reported for NICS background check. Many people have a rep payee that do not have any sort of mental disorder, be it transportation issues, mobility or just do not want to mange their own money.

Read obamas order on the social security rep payee block.