Hillary Clinton 2016 Presidential Thread

I take no broadcast networks seriously. Lemon, lime, or orange.

Edit, paged:

That or everyone is watching MSNBC for the Olympics.

I stopped watching the Olympics a long time ago.

Same with TV, I guess.

The primetime ratings were what I was referring to, which wouldn't apply to MSNBC and the Olympics.

Well it would apply to NBC, whose primetime ratings are through the roof despite horrible and downright offensive coverage this year.

Now listen I know most Clinton supporters on a clear day can see their blindfolds but I hope they take it off and understand and see the ***show that Clinton and her cohorts are doing in Washington DC. You don't want th back in office.

Someone is being told what to say by Alex Jones again.

Whatever makes you sleep better. Another important thing to note is at least Trump is not a coward hiding from the media no matter how hard they scew and blow things out of proportion about him he addresses it and the matters.

Hillary Clinton is a no show and is a coward because she knows what she did and is still doing in congress is wrong and the american people are going to show her November 8th that we don't want her kind in our government. We don't want untouchables that think they are above the law.

Is stating "Alex Jones" the new Fox News/Bigot/Racist cop-out? I fear I'm falling behind on the trends.

No. It's just that Lordgrim takes his "information" all from there.

Lmao you think just because I posted some alex Jones videos and make a topic about it that I get EVERYTHING FROM IT ? And you call me gullible or naive, you little lady are thus said words.

I'm really looking forward to seeing Trump destroy Clinton in the first debate coming up in September

I hope Trump brings up how Hillary Clinton defended a pedophile who raped a 12 year old girl and called her a lair and won the sick guys case. Calling a victim a lair for money. Sums up Clinton

Anyone who looks into what really happened in Waco, Texas in 1993 (not the lies that the media and most of the government told) -- they will not want to vote for Clinton and should think more highly of Alex Jones... but they may not be able to understand. A good place to start is to fully watch the movie called Waco Rules of Engagement and to research the early videos / recordings of Alex Jones as well as Milton William (Bill) Cooper... to see what happened to both of them and figure out why they started to not "get along".

It's a solid indication of the kind of "logic" you're dealing with.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

The world isn't black and white. Just because the Clinton's have done bad things (and I don't think they had any direct control voer Waco) doesn't make Alex Jokes in any way a real journalist or someone worth paying attention to.

Snopes works for Clinton just like the mainstream media

Popular myth-busting website Snopes originally gained recognition for being the go-to site for disproving outlandish urban legends -such as the presence of UFOs in Haiti or the existence of human-animal hybrids in the Amazon jungle.

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to get more than 10-20 shares.

After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals.

She wrote a “fact check” article about Jimmy Carter’s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column arguing against Donald Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.

Similarly, Lacapria — in another “fact check” article — argued Hillary Clinton hadn’t included Benghazi at all in her infamous “we didn’t lose a single person in Libya” gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 Benghazi attack) but offered little fact-based evidence to support her claim.

After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria claimed that just because Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat with an active voter registration status didn’t mean he was actually a Democrat. Her “fact check” argued that he might “have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered.”

Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as “rumors.”

In that “fact check” article, Lacapria argued that “Facebook Trending’s blacklisting of ‘junk topics’ was not only not a scandalous development, but to be expected following the social network’s crackdown on facts I don't like sites.” The opinion-heavy article was mockingly titled: The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You.

Lacapria again played defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she claimed: “Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was peppered with inaccurate details.”

One of the “inaccurate details” cited by Lacapria was that, “The cost of men’s suits worn by fellow politicians didn’t appear in the article for contrast.” She also argued the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,495 jacket, which discussed “raising wages and reducing inequality,” wasn’t actually about income inequality.

not gonna read any of that, but I can tell you Trump is getting his *** kicked! lmao

UFOs (government unacknowledged special access projects / black budge / free-energy / electro-propulsive flying craft) and human animal hybrids (genetically engineered) really do exist... :3

bringing up monica lewinsky, emails, and benghazi hardly counts for "debate." if anything, it'll be like watching this:



trump is the yellow one running at the mouth lol.

You know this is a typical response of Clinton establishment supporters. Whom also complain why the nation is taking a turn for the worse and keep re-electing these treasonous political parties that are the problem.

Samuel Adams said it best.

If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater then the animating contest of freedom , go home from us in peace. We seek not your council nor your arms. Crouch down and luck the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

yet you want to support a man who's policies would cost jobs, divide out minorities, burgeon the national debt, and line the pockets of fools like him?

Edit : lick ( hate cellphone auto type technology sucks)

all what you said right there has been done and accomplished by Clinton political policy.

And yes I am going to vote for Trump because we have not seen his political policy in action yet that has not done any of the above what you stated.

sounds like the GOP has instilled authoritarianism into you to the T.

he's either emulating nixon, being serious about this ludicrous instilling of fear and distracting people from really issues with a scapegoat like "terrorism." it's classic informational warfare, he manipulates you into thinking only he can solve your problems, only he can make you safe.

or he's just a false flag candidate trying to get clinton into office. he's registered as a democrat before, even donated to clinton campaigns.

either way, he's not fit to even live within 50 miles of the oval office, let alone run it.

I have no affiliation to this establishment.

What do you think the establishment has been doing all these years saying the same thing as they get re elected, everything you said. They have failed.

It's time we put a full house senate federal court system and president that's not part of this establishment.

Trumps not part of Washington DC.

Hillary Clinton is and she has failed this nation like the rest of the establishment.

Let's forget Trump's own lauding of a convicted rapist/child abuser in them form of Jeff Epstein?

Look, be anti-Hillary all you want because I certainly can't defend her idiocy.

But being pro-Trump is every bit as bad.