Climatologists Speak Out Against Global Warming.

I never actually watched the show, it was a little after my time.

/clapping.


Did someone mention power rangers?
"I take Steroids"

The simple fact to the whole argument is CO2 is not making the planet warmer. In spite of us pumping CO2 into the atmosphere our planet has refused to warm for the past 19yrs. Any logical person would come to the conclusion that CO2 is not the problem, yet all these people that think they are logical say CO2 is warming the planet and when called out on it they respond like this..

Altima, maybe you missed all the previous threads on this topic where Pleebo already expressed his point of view. There's just little reason to repeat the same things over and over. And that's for you too, why dance around in circles?

You mean with the graphs that were proven to be biased towards the global warming agenda. No.. I didn't miss those threads..


This isn't the same thing over and over, these are actual creditable scientists that say Global warming is a joke.

You mean the graphs you chose to believe were biased, when there wasn't any factual evidence to prove those claims.

And you're talking about bias?

Right or wrong he may be, he did show a stance. No reason to pretend he didn't quoting that laugh.

I'm actually helping you out here. Don't use such cheap tactics for a debate.

Huh? I think I understand what you are trying to say, but you realize this is an internet forum for a 14yr old game right? Not exactly the stage for a formal debate on anything..

As much as he claims to want a debate, he's unmoved by new information and unwilling to admit any holes in his position. He also either pretends to or has no real understanding of scientific terminology or methodology. This whole thread is just an attempt to draw out people he dislikes and attempt to mock their beliefs. So, rightly, some people beat him to the punch.

Pretty sure you got told to stay on topic.. Just sayin.. Maybe if people actually stayed on topic none of what you stated would have to pass.

In every single thread in P&R it always come down to the liberals claiming they are getting mocked after their beliefs get ripped apart. And somehow its always the conservatives fault for their failings.

Wow, what color is the sky in your world?

Depends on the day. Once again, just can't get on topic can you. Maybe try and actually say some something to contribute instead of being inane.

Smart people can say stupid things too, particularly if it isn't necessarily in their field.
Fever (febrile response) is generally defined as a 0.8C range over the high end of normal body temperature(37.5C) Which is within 0.8C of the normal body temperature(37.0C), and 0.8C over what is normally accepted as the upper normal temperature would be a fever (37.8C).
Those numbers vary depending on sex/age/person/etc, but they are the generally used numbers.
A high fever (hyperpyrexia) is significantly higher. Perhaps he meant that.

What he also seems to disregard is the sheer amount of energy in such a small change over a large object.

And saying attributing the warm period as good for humanity, as opposed to the advances in medicine/technology/science seems to be farcical at best.

That's akin to turning up the thermostat in your apartment, and counting that as the reason that your cancer went into remission, rather than the chemotherapy you underwent.

I think Pleebo can field this for me..
Good job Pleebo..

When you get past Nitpicking and come back with an actual response please do.

So Milamber posts an on topic opinion and you respond with a laugh and a dismissal, then complain people are off topic. Classic altima.

A 0.8c temperature change is 1.4f. As I'm sick and I've been running a fever off and on for a couple of days I can say Yes with absolute certainity that I feel a difference going from 37.0c to 37.8c or 38.0c to 38.8c

As I'm also pregnant an increase in temperature correlates with an increase in nausea. A direct affect on my body which is very noticeable

If you've never experienced a fever maybe that's why you can't comprehend why what this guy stated sounds silly.

Except for its as off topic, on topic can get.. I was kinda interested in what he was saying until he says smh...

But hey keep on defending conjecture and just plain biased off topic information.

The moon's distance is a direct result of it's creation.

If you've never experienced a fever you are only lucky mofo.
Fevers suck

A newborn baby with a temperature increase of 0.8c will be affected more than a full grown man. For many reasons.

This doesn't mean the full grown man is not affected it means the affects will be different. E.g. Potential brian damage vs. Discomfort/irrationality

Really because he is responding to a quote from the article you posted in your OP. How is that offtopic? What exactly are you expecting people to post? You have pretty much laughed off everyone and called it "nitpicking." Well, why don't you share what you expect people to respond to in this thread? Because so far, according to you, everyone is posting off topic (except for you of course). Pretty clear case of why altima should not be allowed to create threads.

*sigh*
Yeah. If you can't understand that the normal body temperature of differing individuals is not necessarily going to be identical, when one can be an male olympic athlete, another is a newborn/infant, and a third is a pregnant woman, well then... that explains a lot.
Hell, your temperature usually fluxuates throughout the day.

And thinking the fact that I actually put that the medical defintion of fever fluxuates somewhat implies weakness to my statement itself also says a lot.

Its hysterical to take this guys fever remark and use it as ammunition against his stance. It's not uncommon for the left side of this forum to do exactly that to every single subject. (Got nothing.. make a big deal about nothing and hope nobody notices.)

No.....

That is not at all what I was implying.

I was explaining why people can be affected differently by a 0.8c temperature change

Edit:
You are the one who posted his comment. If you don't want it analyzed don't post it.

Altima: I add nothing, therefore, everyone else posts less than nothing. I shall call actual arguments "nothing", facts "nitpicking", and actual science "religious fervor"

Tried to edit to respond to all 3 of you guys comments, but yeah I know exactly what you are trying to do.

Yup I made this to debate about the earths .8 degree fever in comparison to humans. You got me.. you guys win Good Job!