Random Politics & Religion #00
|
Random Politics & Religion #00
Obama is talking guys I can feel his greatness through the TV !
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » fonewear said: » That begs the question why have kids in the first place. You can avoid this issue altogether. If you can't tell people what to do/think what good are you ? I'm pretty sure that is the main reason women exist also... Cerberus.Pleebo said: » information which would require more than thirty seconds to read. YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
I think P and R works at it's finest when we don't read anything over 20 words.
Obama is basically saying "Iran be nice or we will put you in the corner"
What he should say is "Iran behave or we will nuke you back into the stone age" Which coincidentally judging by the living conditions. Looks just like the modern era... fonewear said: » I think P and R works at it's finest when we don't read anything over 20 words. I see. THAT is why you hate Twitter. It's got 7x more reading than you want to see.
[+]
Ramyrez said: » fonewear said: » I think P and R works at it's finest when we don't read anything over 20 words. I see. THAT is why you hate Twitter. It's got 7x more reading than you want to see. It's true 140 characters is more than my feeble little mind can process. That and it is unnecessarily complicated for me cause I'm old. fonewear said: » Which coincidentally judging by the living conditions. Looks just like the modern era...  mmhmm...
[+]
They do have roads which is a shock to me though !
Could they be bombed back into being Persia? I've always wanted a real Persian rug, and that's impossible, what with there not being a Persia anymore.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No they haven't. No one has produced an accurate climate model in the past thirty years. Put up or shut up. Quote: When the phase of natural variability is taken into account, the model 15-year warming trends in CMIP5 projections well estimate the observed trends for all 15-year periods over the past half-century. More info for you to ignore after you're done dismissing the above information. YouTube Video Placeholder Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No they haven't. No one has produced an accurate climate model in the past thirty years. Put up or shut up. Quote: When the phase of natural variability is taken into account, the model 15-year warming trends in CMIP5 projections well estimate the observed trends for all 15-year periods over the past half-century. More info for you to ignore after you're done dismissing the above information. The first link attempts to establish credibility for future modeling based on "correcting" the errors of the past. Nothing more than "trust us in our NEW predictions". At least that's what I get from the abstract I'm not going to pay 32 bucks for such a document. I hope (I pray actually) you don't/didn't spend that kind of money on this cultish nonsense. Your second article, is an attempt to use modeling to explain previous warming trends (written in 2007, cataloging trends from 1880-2003) so basically another attempt to establish credibility going forward. Your third article is more of the same, 'this is why climate models going forward (written in 2007) are trustworthy'. There's not one graph projecting temps beyond the year the article was written. ------- So, here's the level of debate global warming has come to. I requested a previous model that was accurate in it predictions of justifiable alarmism in an attempt to address my skepticism. You don't provide any, but instead provide articles preaching how models are 'super sciency' and just should not be subject to my skepticism. Way to flunk out of Jedi school! Atta boy! Pleebo apparently is too ignorant to backread today, thanks for the laugh though. "Uhh it does not give me pause that Mr Assad or others in Tehran uhh may be trying to spin the deal uhhh in a way that uhhh they think is favorable to what their constituencies wanna hear. That's what politicians do."
- Barack Obama (moments ago in a press conference selling the Iran deal to his constituents)
[+]
"Persia" was a way cooler name than "Iran" too.
Sadly it doesn't make for a catchy They Might Be Giants song the way Istanbul/Constantinople did. I think he is just happy to get the deal done so he can look back and say "See I did stuff in office see" !
Either you are with me or you are with the terrorists !
Obama doing his best George W You know when I first looked at that picture I posted it was small so I didn't get to see how big that city was, holy ***.
The only city I know of in Iran is Tehran.
Disneyland Iran is pretty nice though !
fonewear said: » I think he is just happy to get the deal done so he can look back and say "Uhhh see I uhhh did stuff in office see" ! ftfy
[+]
What if Iran gets a bomb "*** I don't know let Hillary deal with it"
*drops the mic* I'd die happy if he says this. Tehran *clicks Donate Now on the Clinton Foundation page*
[+]
Every american president needs a foreign enemy to fight. Don't worry something will come up next elections, whoever wins.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Every american president needs a foreign enemy to fight. Don't worry something will come up next elections, whoever wins. It is the only reason CNN exists. So we can see who we are at war with today ! Obama looks like he stuck his head in a bowling ball waxing machine...maybe being shiny on TV is a new thing.
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Pleebo apparently is too ignorant to backread today, thanks for the laugh though. Your assessment is wrong anyway. To the surprise of no one, ever. You asked for accurate models. I provided documents that assessed accuracy plus some info on the models themselves and how they're evaluated. I can't help with the paywall but the second paper fulfills your requirements. Revel in your ignorance \o/
[+]
Look providing proof to an argument is discouraged. We need wild speculation and unfounded opinions to keep this website running !
Welp, that backread wasn't worth my time. Who's up for a game of Scrabble?
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Welp, that backread wasn't worth my time. Who's up for a game of Scrabble? Wheel of fortune ? Here we go: People who annoy you N G G E R S !
[+]
|
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.