I can understand the thread nuking, but why the post? We use sarcasm pretty much everywhere.
The sarcasm is intended for not what you think it is intended for.
That makes no sense.
Alright.
The thread was made because he was topicbanned in a previous thread he was baiting and assisting the previous derail. This was his attempt to get back at the user.
I'd say I've done a pretty good job about not getting banned from anything, but I do have to come out and say that it's a bit odd how well-protected that particular thread is from any criticism.
Not entirely well-protected. The topic starter has a certain set of abilities that they can request of the thread and within reason, we can oblige these requests. So, it's actually the OP who is protecting their own thread.
Wait, what abilities can a topic started have, and why don't we know what they are?
Well, if it is an issue with me posting it, since I am topic banned, then there is no issue with someone else posting it, since they aren't topic banned?
I can understand the thread nuking, but why the post? We use sarcasm pretty much everywhere.
The sarcasm is intended for not what you think it is intended for.
That makes no sense.
Alright.
The thread was made because he was topicbanned in a previous thread he was baiting and assisting the previous derail. This was his attempt to get back at the user.
If Lordgrim can't handle being asked for clarification because his English is subpar, or being asked for empirical data, or being told that Hydra the three headed animal is not real he shouldn't be posting in P&R.
That, btw, is not baiting. That's debating and pointing out flaws in someones argument.
And as KN stated what powers do we have as OP starters?
I'd say I've done a pretty good job about not getting banned from anything, but I do have to come out and say that it's a bit odd how well-protected that particular thread is from any criticism.
Not entirely well-protected. The topic starter has a certain set of abilities that they can request of the thread and within reason, we can oblige these requests. So, it's actually the OP who is protecting their own thread.
Wait, what abilities can a topic started have, and why don't we know what they are?
No one ever asks.
-Gain the ability to request a topicban, post delete, and title adjustments.
-All post deletes and topicbans must have a valid reason. You can't request for no reason or an invalid response.
It's been this way for a long time. Few people actually use it.
Well, if it is an issue with me posting it, since I am topic banned, then there is no issue with someone else posting it, since they aren't topic banned?
Quite the charmer. Perhaps it's best if you drop it.
I can understand the thread nuking, but why the post? We use sarcasm pretty much everywhere.
The sarcasm is intended for not what you think it is intended for.
That makes no sense.
Alright.
The thread was made because he was topicbanned in a previous thread he was baiting and assisting the previous derail. This was his attempt to get back at the user.
If Lordgrim can't handle being asked for clarification because his English is subpar, or being asked for empirical data, or being told that Hydra the three headed animal is not real he shouldn't be posting in P&R.
That, btw, is not baiting. That's debating and pointing out flaws in someones argument.
And as KN stated what powers do we have as OP starters?
Seriously, why is his thread not at least been demained? It is pretty obvious that the entire thread is a troll thread, because no sane person actually believes the crap he believes.
I understand why I was topicbanned from it, I did post a meme pointing out that the thread was a troll thread, but most of my posts were deleted, especially the ones that pointed out the flaws of his argument....
-Gain the ability to request a topicban, post delete, and title adjustments.
-All post deletes and topicbans must have a valid reason. You can't request for no reason or an invalid response.
It's been this way for a long time. Few people actually use it.
I asked for topic bans from certain people some the time and I get ignored....
But as Aelius said, I'm going to drop it.
Now that I know of this, I'm going to reference this next time I ask for a topic ban of somebody.
Abstinence declared Super Effective!
Global birth rates dropped on Monday as abstaining from sex rolled a perfect 20, scoring a critical hit. When asked, Jeremiah Blodgers, the leader of the drive to prevent sex, indicated that hammers worked best. "Ya seer, take this here handle in that thar hand, and just whack it around a bit. That drives out the penis demons." Removal of the penis demons was found to play a crucial role in maintaining abstinence until death.
In further news, humanity is now predicted to be extinct within the next 30 years. Back to you, Bob!
If Lordgrim can't handle being asked for clarification because his English is subpar, or being asked for empirical data, or being told that Hydra the three headed animal is not real he shouldn't be posting in P&R.
That, btw, is not baiting. That's debating and pointing out flaws in someones argument.
And as KN stated what powers do we have as OP starters?
*groans*
Let me ask you this.
You make a claim. You post a youtube video to substantiate your claim and stick to it. Person comes in and attempts to discredit your source by attempts to derail then gets topicbanned themselves in the process, then that person proceeds to create a thread to post all the youtube conspiracy videos just to make up stuff so he can have the ability to topic ban others any way he sees fit. Would you feel this person is insulting you?
Sorry, if you don't see the abuse here, I don't know what else to tell you. Milamber was caught derailing, he was requested to be removed, he was removed, escalated to this on reaction.
Isn't this a form of what you guys all call QQing anyways?
This is a thread that I found on another website I post at. It can be really really interesting. I thought it deserved a place here.
Post your random thoughts for the day here, or anything else that intrigues you.
For starters, is it possible to give constructive critism to someone who doesn't have a neck? I totally just walked by a girl who didn't. Someone isn't getting a necklace for Valentines day!
And who decided black and white can't be colors? I want to say a racist. I really do.