Uguisumaru

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Langues: JP EN FR DE
users online
Forum » FFXI » Jobs » Samurai » Uguisumaru
Uguisumaru
First Page 2 3 4 5
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-06-04 11:23:33
Link | Citer | R
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
No, haste doesn't diminish in that fashion; and I wasn't encouraging him at all, nor did I even read his post. Happened to be scrolling and saw what you bolded and responded strictly to that.
Haste does diminish in that fashion by that logic, 1% haste is less of the total when added to a higher number, but we all know that its MORE potent the more you have. The bold was in response to the earler bolded part where he insulted my intelligence and told me to go back to elementary school. So I bolded basic math.
Cerberus.Taint said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
DA experiences diminishing returns
No, 1+1=2 50+1=51 When you add 1% its always 1% unless you're at 100% already. I learned that in Elementary School. than 590...
DA does experience dimishing returns. Going from 0 to 1 DA is 1% increase. Going from 50 to 51 DA is a .66% increase.
its ALWAYS an additional attack per 100 attacks, never changes.
We don't care about the number of attacks though is the point. When you're comparing gear options, you're comparing your damage output, which IS diminished. You're talking about ***that is irrelevant to gearing and why you'd want to consider these types of things, rather than damage comparison, which is where everyone else is at.

Because its not just a damage comparison, 1% more is ALWAYS MORE.

If increasing damage is the goal, why would you try to think your way out of stone cold math? There are no diminishing returns, 1% DA is ALWAYS 1 more attack per 100 attacks.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Serveur: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15064
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2013-06-04 11:23:55
Link | Citer | R
 
Basically it works like this

If you have 50% DA and want to add 3 DA, = 2% increase

If you have 0% DA and add 3% DA = 3% increase

The main difference this makes, is that in the first scenario, the gear you're comparing the DA to would only need to give you a 2.01% increase or higher to be the better option.

In the second scenario, the gear you're comparing the DA to would need to give you more than a 3% increase to win.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Serveur: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15064
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2013-06-04 11:25:08
Link | Citer | R
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
No, haste doesn't diminish in that fashion; and I wasn't encouraging him at all, nor did I even read his post. Happened to be scrolling and saw what you bolded and responded strictly to that.
Haste does diminish in that fashion by that logic, 1% haste is less of the total when added to a higher number, but we all know that its MORE potent the more you have. The bold was in response to the earler bolded part where he insulted my intelligence and told me to go back to elementary school. So I bolded basic math.
Cerberus.Taint said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
DA experiences diminishing returns
No, 1+1=2 50+1=51 When you add 1% its always 1% unless you're at 100% already. I learned that in Elementary School. than 590...
DA does experience dimishing returns. Going from 0 to 1 DA is 1% increase. Going from 50 to 51 DA is a .66% increase.
its ALWAYS an additional attack per 100 attacks, never changes.
We don't care about the number of attacks though is the point. When you're comparing gear options, you're comparing your damage output, which IS diminished. You're talking about ***that is irrelevant to gearing and why you'd want to consider these types of things, rather than damage comparison, which is where everyone else is at.

Because its not just a damage comparison, 1% more is ALWAYS MORE.

If increasing damage is the goal, why would you try to think your way out of stone cold math? There are no diminishing returns, 1% DA is ALWAYS 1 more attack per 100 attacks.
The number of attacks isn't diminishing.

When people say double attack has diminishing returns, they're not talking about the number of attacks. They' talking about the damage you gain from adding DA gear.

Again, nobody gives a flying *** about the number of attacks. They care about what they're going to gain from adding X piece of gear over Y piece of gear.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-06-04 11:26:13
Link | Citer | R
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
Basically it works like this If you have 50% DA and want to add 3 DA, = 2% increase If you have 0% DA and add 3% DA = 3% increase The main difference this makes, is that in the first scenario, the gear you're comparing the DA to would only need to give you a 2.01% increase or higher to be the better option. In the second scenario, the gear you're comparing the DA to would need to give you more than a 3% increase to win.

That's not the way it works. 3% DA is not a 3% damage increase...

If someone doesn't know if they'll get an increase with one piece of gear over another, they need to use Mot's sheets. These arbitrary and incorrect examples are going to give them the false impression they're gaining something or losing something when they may not.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Serveur: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15064
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2013-06-04 11:30:35
Link | Citer | R
 
It is when you have 0% DA to begin with.

Again, for simplicity, attack for 1 dmg/attack.

100 attacks @ 0% DA = 100 dmg
100 attacks @ 3% DA = 103 dmg

103/100 = 3% increase.

If you want to use other numbers, let's say our average attack/hit is 67.2

100 attack rounds @ 0% DA = 6720 damage
100 attack rounds @ 3% DA = 103 attacks = 6921.6 dmg

6921.6/6720 = 3% increase in damage
By volkom 2013-06-04 11:32:35
Link | Citer | R
 
its QA > TA > DA for which has precedence right?
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-06-04 11:33:32
Link | Citer | R
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
It is when you have 0% DA to begin with. Again, for simplicity, attack for 1 dmg/attack. 100 attacks @ 0% DA = 100 dmg 100 attacks @ 3% DA = 103 dmg 103/100 = 3% increase. If you want to use other numbers, let's say our average attack/hit is 67.2 100 attack rounds @ 0% DA = 6720 damage 100 attack rounds @ 3% DA = 103 attacks = 6921.6 dmg 6921.6/6720 = 3% increase in damage

No, just no...

lets say ALL attacks do 1 damage and there are no such thing as weaponskills or crits or buffs, then you can make the comparison of attack = damage, but that is NOT how it works.

More DA means more attacks per round, means more weaponskills, more crits, more ODD attacks, etc etc etc. 1%DA is VASTLY removed from 1% damage.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-06-04 11:35:22
Link | Citer | R
 
volkom said: »
its QA > TA > DA for which has precedence right?


Correct, then Zanshin then lastly OA weapons.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Serveur: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15064
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2013-06-04 11:36:57
Link | Citer | R
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
It is when you have 0% DA to begin with. Again, for simplicity, attack for 1 dmg/attack. 100 attacks @ 0% DA = 100 dmg 100 attacks @ 3% DA = 103 dmg 103/100 = 3% increase. If you want to use other numbers, let's say our average attack/hit is 67.2 100 attack rounds @ 0% DA = 6720 damage 100 attack rounds @ 3% DA = 103 attacks = 6921.6 dmg 6921.6/6720 = 3% increase in damage

No, just no...

lets say ALL attacks do 1 damage and there are no such thing as weaponskills or crits or buffs, then you can make the comparison of attack = damage, but that is NOT how it works.

More DA means more attacks per round, means more weaponskills, more crits, more ODD attacks, etc etc etc. 1%DA is VASTLY removed from 1% damage.
Yes, 3% more ws than before, 3% more crits, 3% more ODD

3% in every damage category is a 3% increase overall.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-06-04 11:47:03
Link | Citer | R
 
*facepalm*
 Cerberus.Taint
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Taint
Posts: 1514
By Cerberus.Taint 2013-06-04 11:52:07
Link | Citer | R
 
Cerberus.Taint said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »

Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
DA experiences diminishing returns


No, 1+1=2 50+1=51
When you add 1% its always 1% unless you're at 100% already. I learned that in Elementary School.

than 590...


DA does experience dimishing returns.

Going from 0 to 1 DA is 1% increase.

Going from 50 to 51 DA is a .66% increase.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Serveur: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15064
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2013-06-04 11:53:47
Link | Citer | R
 
Attacks = 1 dmg
ODD = 2 dmg
Crits = 3 DMG
WS = 21 dmg

0% DA in 100 attack rounds

80 melee attacks = 80 dmg
10 ODD = 20 dmg
10 crits = 30 dmg
32 ws = 672 dmg
=802 dmg

3% DA in 100 attack rounds
82.4 melee attacks = 82.4 dmg
10.3 ODD = 20.6 dmg
10.3 crits = 30.9 dmg
32.96 WS = 692.16
= 823.66 dmg

826.06/802 = 1.03 = 3% increase in damage.

Though, showing me differently would be more effective than facepalming
[+]
 Asura.Ccl
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: ccl
Posts: 1995
By Asura.Ccl 2013-06-04 15:23:21
Link | Citer | R
 
For Saeval: Just finished a morimar farm, no accuracy buff but hasso(rcb as food):

hit/miss: 592/33 acc%: 94,72 %

Also DA favor 2 hit ws more than single hit ws.
 Fenrir.Motenten
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Motenten
Posts: 764
By Fenrir.Motenten 2013-06-04 16:33:03
Link | Citer | R
 
Jassik: This argument seems to come up every year or two, by someone who can't quite grasp how the math works.

Simple answer: You're correct in the most simplistic sense, but wrong in any meaningful sense. Simply accept that, and try to figure out why things are described the way they are. Tigerwoods has written several posts that very clearly show the issue.

In particular:
Jassik said:
1% DA is ALWAYS 1 more attack per 100 attacks.

This is factually incorrect. Ignoring the issues with TA/QA, it's equivalent to claiming that, if you had 10% DA beforehand, and attacked over 1000 rounds, such that you made 1100 attacks, adding 1% DA will add 11 more attacks.


Approaching from a different angle, do not try to think of 3% DA as 3% more attacks, think of it as an arbitrary modifier to your current build that can increase your damage by some unquantified amount. The only thing that matters is how much damage you do without the 3% DA, and how much damage you do with the 3% DA.

The amount you gain from the 3% DA depends on every other piece of gear you're wearing, as well as any buffs you're getting. All of those other items put together give you your overall damage output capability (generally described in terms of DPS). You then add the 3% DA and see what the new DPS value is, and divide B/A to find your percent gain.

Over time people have realized that the result of B/A is most notably dependent on how much DA you already have. As you add more DA to the A portion, adding a fixed quantity of additional DA to the B portion yields a smaller and smaller B/A ratio. Thus: diminishing returns.

Since you also brought up haste, it works exactly opposite that. As more and more haste is added to the A portion, adding a fixed quantity to the B portion -increases- the B/A ratio. Thus: increasing returns.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 856
By mattyc 2013-06-05 14:27:05
Link | Citer | R
 
this post become full *** retard real fast.
oh wait that was like 3 pages ago.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Serveur: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2013-06-05 14:59:15
Link | Citer | R
 
Fenrir.Motenten said: »
Jassik: This argument seems to come up every year or two, by someone who can't quite grasp how the math works. Simple answer: You're correct in the most simplistic sense, but wrong in any meaningful sense. Simply accept that, and try to figure out why things are described the way they are. Tigerwoods has written several posts that very clearly show the issue. In particular:
Jassik said:
1% DA is ALWAYS 1 more attack per 100 attacks.
This is factually incorrect. Ignoring the issues with TA/QA, it's equivalent to claiming that, if you had 10% DA beforehand, and attacked over 1000 rounds, such that you made 1100 attacks, adding 1% DA will add 11 more attacks. Approaching from a different angle, do not try to think of 3% DA as 3% more attacks, think of it as an arbitrary modifier to your current build that can increase your damage by some unquantified amount. The only thing that matters is how much damage you do without the 3% DA, and how much damage you do with the 3% DA. The amount you gain from the 3% DA depends on every other piece of gear you're wearing, as well as any buffs you're getting. All of those other items put together give you your overall damage output capability (generally described in terms of DPS). You then add the 3% DA and see what the new DPS value is, and divide B/A to find your percent gain. Over time people have realized that the result of B/A is most notably dependent on how much DA you already have. As you add more DA to the A portion, adding a fixed quantity of additional DA to the B portion yields a smaller and smaller B/A ratio. Thus: diminishing returns. Since you also brought up haste, it works exactly opposite that. As more and more haste is added to the A portion, adding a fixed quantity to the B portion -increases- the B/A ratio. Thus: increasing returns.

I said nearly exactly this, just not nearly as well. My point was that something like Duplus is only 1% more than Pole, and while that might mean less of a damage increase when you already have 30% DA than it does when you have 0, its always 1% more. More is more, and there's no amount of double attack below 100% that makes it not better.

I also gave haste as an example of how the idea of diminishing returns doesn't apply to everything.
 Cerberus.Elflegolas
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Elf23
Posts: 11
By Cerberus.Elflegolas 2013-06-05 16:41:21
Link | Citer | R
 
Pretty sure what Taint was after from the OP were sets to boost overall damage, not go OCD and stack as much DA as possible. Any idiot that can add knows that 50%DA +1%DA=51%DA, although apparently not all know that there is a point at which more DA= bad choice. DA is one of many many factors in overall damage. How did this discussion get sidetracked off on this tangent again? Oh wait...
 Asura.Tamoa
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Tamoa
Posts: 1341
By Asura.Tamoa 2013-06-15 05:42:15
Link | Citer | R
 
I know someone's asked this before but I can't find it - to what rank should I be taking Uguisumaru at the very least? I'm not entirely sure I want to blow 30+ mil on fully upgrading it, considering I have 99 Masa/Amano and I'm still hoping SE will fix my R/Es sooner rather than later.
 Ramuh.Lorzy
Offline
Serveur: Ramuh
Game: FFXI
user: Lorzy
Posts: 1356
By Ramuh.Lorzy 2013-06-15 05:46:06
Link | Citer | R
 
i would just do rank 2 but i'm cheap
 Asura.Projekt
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Projekt
Posts: 60
By Asura.Projekt 2013-06-22 09:54:29
Link | Citer | R
 
ItemSet 155129

Beats the recommended set:
ItemSet 299677

Sure it's by a minuscule amount, 57.237 Total Damage and 4.3 dps, but it also includes +12 Acc, while unfortunately dropping 16 attack. Plus it looks a hell of a lot better than using Unkai body.

Even putting Oneiros ring on the recommended set or Candent Ring on my set, the set I posted, beats it. Again let me say, by a minuscule amount.

Also, have a question, since my spreadsheet doesn't seem to want to work properly when I try to use Usu+1 hands.
Can anyone work out, replacing Tenryu+1 Aug and Dynamic+1 with Usu+1 hands and I guess Phos Belt(to hit 26% or you could keep Dynamic+1 and sit at 25%)?

Kind of a budget way of not being able to get Tenryu+1.

Edit** New at this spreadsheet business, pretty much looking for critique on the Usu set.
 Cerberus.Taint
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Taint
Posts: 1514
By Cerberus.Taint 2013-06-22 10:56:59
Link | Citer | R
 
Asura.Projekt said: »
ItemSet 155129

Beats the recommended set:
ItemSet 299677

Sure it's by a minuscule amount, 57.237 Total Damage and 4.3 dps, but it also includes +12 Acc, while unfortunately dropping 16 attack. Plus it looks a hell of a lot better than using Unkai body.

Even putting Oneiros ring on the recommended set or Candent Ring on my set, the set I posted, beats it. Again let me say, by a minuscule amount.

Also, have a question, since my spreadsheet doesn't seem to want to work properly when I try to use Usu+1 hands.
Can anyone work out, replacing Tenryu+1 Aug and Dynamic+1 with Usu+1 hands and I guess Phos Belt(to hit 26% or you could keep Dynamic+1 and sit at 25%)?

Kind of a budget way of not being able to get Tenryu+1.

Edit** New at this spreadsheet business, pretty much looking for critique on the Usu set.


What kind of mob? What kind of buffs? What is the ACC comparison?

Simply saying it beats a set doesn't help without the details of how
 Asura.Projekt
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Projekt
Posts: 60
By Asura.Projekt 2013-06-22 11:49:11
Link | Citer | R
 
Cerberus.Taint said: »
What kind of mob? What kind of buffs? What is the ACC comparison?

Simply saying it beats a set doesn't help without the details of how

Sorry, I was actually thinking that as I posted, but assumed Delve Fodder was the norm.

Buffs: RCB, Hasso, Zerk/Agg,Haste, 2x March

ItemSet 155129
967 Att
642 Acc

ItemSet 299677
987 Att
630 Acc

Turning marches off/on and/or turning minuets on/off, still shows the Usu set as winning by 4-10 dps and 50-100 total damage
 Cerberus.Taint
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Taint
Posts: 1514
By Cerberus.Taint 2013-06-22 12:43:03
Link | Citer | R
 
The only way set one wins is with Oneiros ring, which no DD is going to use. (no DD worth a ***atleast)

Its pretty much 4% crit vs 10% Zanshin.

Both sets cap ACC, both require some ACC in the WS set. With SAMs TP overflow not accounted well in the spread sheet, set two is still the clear winner, but they are close. Usukane+1 body is reserved for boss lvl content with Fighters roll. Where Zanhasso is diluted and the crit bonus is magnified and even then is probably not worth it.
 Asura.Projekt
Offline
Serveur: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Projekt
Posts: 60
By Asura.Projekt 2013-06-22 13:11:42
Link | Citer | R
 
Cerberus.Taint said: »
The only way set one wins is with Oneiros ring, which no DD is going to use. (no DD worth a ***atleast)

Its pretty much 4% crit vs 10% Zanshin.

Both sets cap ACC, both require some ACC in the WS set. With SAMs TP overflow not accounted well in the spread sheet, set two is still the clear winner, but they are close. Usukane+1 body is reserved for boss lvl content with Fighters roll. Where Zanhasso is diluted and the crit bonus is magnified and even then is probably not worth it.

Ah, I see what you mean with ZanHasso and I agree they are very close to each other. As for the Oneiros ring, switching it out with Candent in the UsuBody set still tips in favour of the UsuBody set. But again, the comparison of both sets is so minuscule it doesn't really matter.

How about the UsuBody set with Usu+1 Hands and Phos belt(or Dynamic+1 with 25% Haste)? Unfortunately the dps Spreadsheet is broken and doesn't calculate the values properly and gets errors when equiping Usu+1 Hands. Just looking for an alternative to Tenryu+1 that will compete with the UnkaiBody set.
 Cerberus.Taint
Offline
Serveur: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Taint
Posts: 1514
By Cerberus.Taint 2013-06-22 13:24:52
Link | Citer | R
 
Just manually add the hands.